From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 12/46] fs: dcache scale lru
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 20:44:42 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <73262b3142d9650bcebd67ad301b36553ce8924f.1290852959.git.npiggin@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1290852958.git.npiggin@kernel.dk>
Add a new lock, dcache_lru_lock, to protect the dcache LRU list from concurrent
modification. d_lru is also protected by d_lock.
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
---
fs/dcache.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
index 50c65c7..aa410b6 100644
--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -37,11 +37,19 @@
/*
* Usage:
- * dcache_hash_lock protects dcache hash table
+ * dcache_hash_lock protects:
+ * - the dcache hash table
+ * dcache_lru_lock protects:
+ * - the dcache lru lists and counters
+ * d_lock protects:
+ * - d_flags
+ * - d_name
+ * - d_lru
*
* Ordering:
* dcache_lock
* dentry->d_lock
+ * dcache_lru_lock
* dcache_hash_lock
*
* if (dentry1 < dentry2)
@@ -52,6 +60,7 @@ int sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure __read_mostly = 100;
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure);
__cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SPINLOCK(dcache_hash_lock);
+static __cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SPINLOCK(dcache_lru_lock);
__cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SPINLOCK(dcache_lock);
__cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SEQLOCK(rename_lock);
@@ -148,28 +157,38 @@ static void dentry_iput(struct dentry * dentry)
}
/*
- * dentry_lru_(add|del|move_tail) must be called with dcache_lock held.
+ * dentry_lru_(add|del|move_tail) must be called with d_lock held.
*/
static void dentry_lru_add(struct dentry *dentry)
{
if (list_empty(&dentry->d_lru)) {
+ spin_lock(&dcache_lru_lock);
list_add(&dentry->d_lru, &dentry->d_sb->s_dentry_lru);
dentry->d_sb->s_nr_dentry_unused++;
percpu_counter_inc(&nr_dentry_unused);
+ spin_unlock(&dcache_lru_lock);
}
}
+static void __dentry_lru_del(struct dentry *dentry)
+{
+ list_del_init(&dentry->d_lru);
+ dentry->d_sb->s_nr_dentry_unused--;
+ percpu_counter_dec(&nr_dentry_unused);
+}
+
static void dentry_lru_del(struct dentry *dentry)
{
if (!list_empty(&dentry->d_lru)) {
- list_del_init(&dentry->d_lru);
- dentry->d_sb->s_nr_dentry_unused--;
- percpu_counter_dec(&nr_dentry_unused);
+ spin_lock(&dcache_lru_lock);
+ __dentry_lru_del(dentry);
+ spin_unlock(&dcache_lru_lock);
}
}
static void dentry_lru_move_tail(struct dentry *dentry)
{
+ spin_lock(&dcache_lru_lock);
if (list_empty(&dentry->d_lru)) {
list_add_tail(&dentry->d_lru, &dentry->d_sb->s_dentry_lru);
dentry->d_sb->s_nr_dentry_unused++;
@@ -177,6 +196,7 @@ static void dentry_lru_move_tail(struct dentry *dentry)
} else {
list_move_tail(&dentry->d_lru, &dentry->d_sb->s_dentry_lru);
}
+ spin_unlock(&dcache_lru_lock);
}
/**
@@ -186,6 +206,8 @@ static void dentry_lru_move_tail(struct dentry *dentry)
* The dentry must already be unhashed and removed from the LRU.
*
* If this is the root of the dentry tree, return NULL.
+ *
+ * dcache_lock and d_lock must be held by caller, are dropped by d_kill.
*/
static struct dentry *d_kill(struct dentry *dentry)
__releases(dentry->d_lock)
@@ -341,10 +363,19 @@ int d_invalidate(struct dentry * dentry)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(d_invalidate);
/* This should be called _only_ with dcache_lock held */
+static inline struct dentry * __dget_locked_dlock(struct dentry *dentry)
+{
+ atomic_inc(&dentry->d_count);
+ dentry_lru_del(dentry);
+ return dentry;
+}
+
static inline struct dentry * __dget_locked(struct dentry *dentry)
{
atomic_inc(&dentry->d_count);
+ spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
dentry_lru_del(dentry);
+ spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
return dentry;
}
@@ -423,7 +454,7 @@ restart:
list_for_each_entry(dentry, &inode->i_dentry, d_alias) {
spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
if (!atomic_read(&dentry->d_count)) {
- __dget_locked(dentry);
+ __dget_locked_dlock(dentry);
__d_drop(dentry);
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
@@ -447,7 +478,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(d_prune_aliases);
static void prune_one_dentry(struct dentry * dentry)
__releases(dentry->d_lock)
__releases(dcache_lock)
- __acquires(dcache_lock)
{
__d_drop(dentry);
dentry = d_kill(dentry);
@@ -456,15 +486,16 @@ static void prune_one_dentry(struct dentry * dentry)
* Prune ancestors. Locking is simpler than in dput(),
* because dcache_lock needs to be taken anyway.
*/
- spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
while (dentry) {
- if (!atomic_dec_and_lock(&dentry->d_count, &dentry->d_lock))
+ spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
+ if (!atomic_dec_and_lock(&dentry->d_count, &dentry->d_lock)) {
+ spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
return;
+ }
dentry_lru_del(dentry);
__d_drop(dentry);
dentry = d_kill(dentry);
- spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
}
}
@@ -474,21 +505,31 @@ static void shrink_dentry_list(struct list_head *list)
while (!list_empty(list)) {
dentry = list_entry(list->prev, struct dentry, d_lru);
- dentry_lru_del(dentry);
+
+ if (!spin_trylock(&dentry->d_lock)) {
+ spin_unlock(&dcache_lru_lock);
+ cpu_relax();
+ spin_lock(&dcache_lru_lock);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ __dentry_lru_del(dentry);
/*
* We found an inuse dentry which was not removed from
* the LRU because of laziness during lookup. Do not free
* it - just keep it off the LRU list.
*/
- spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
if (atomic_read(&dentry->d_count)) {
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
continue;
}
+ spin_unlock(&dcache_lru_lock);
+
prune_one_dentry(dentry);
- /* dentry->d_lock was dropped in prune_one_dentry() */
- cond_resched_lock(&dcache_lock);
+ /* dcache_lock and dentry->d_lock dropped */
+ spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
+ spin_lock(&dcache_lru_lock);
}
}
@@ -509,32 +550,36 @@ static void __shrink_dcache_sb(struct super_block *sb, int *count, int flags)
int cnt = *count;
spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
+relock:
+ spin_lock(&dcache_lru_lock);
while (!list_empty(&sb->s_dentry_lru)) {
dentry = list_entry(sb->s_dentry_lru.prev,
struct dentry, d_lru);
BUG_ON(dentry->d_sb != sb);
+ if (!spin_trylock(&dentry->d_lock)) {
+ spin_unlock(&dcache_lru_lock);
+ cpu_relax();
+ goto relock;
+ }
+
/*
* If we are honouring the DCACHE_REFERENCED flag and the
* dentry has this flag set, don't free it. Clear the flag
* and put it back on the LRU.
*/
- if (flags & DCACHE_REFERENCED) {
- spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
- if (dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_REFERENCED) {
- dentry->d_flags &= ~DCACHE_REFERENCED;
- list_move(&dentry->d_lru, &referenced);
- spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
- cond_resched_lock(&dcache_lock);
- continue;
- }
+ if (flags & DCACHE_REFERENCED &&
+ dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_REFERENCED) {
+ dentry->d_flags &= ~DCACHE_REFERENCED;
+ list_move(&dentry->d_lru, &referenced);
+ spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
+ } else {
+ list_move_tail(&dentry->d_lru, &tmp);
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
+ if (!--cnt)
+ break;
}
-
- list_move_tail(&dentry->d_lru, &tmp);
- if (!--cnt)
- break;
- cond_resched_lock(&dcache_lock);
+ /* XXX: re-add cond_resched_lock when dcache_lock goes away */
}
*count = cnt;
@@ -542,6 +587,7 @@ static void __shrink_dcache_sb(struct super_block *sb, int *count, int flags)
if (!list_empty(&referenced))
list_splice(&referenced, &sb->s_dentry_lru);
+ spin_unlock(&dcache_lru_lock);
spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
}
@@ -637,10 +683,12 @@ void shrink_dcache_sb(struct super_block *sb)
LIST_HEAD(tmp);
spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
+ spin_lock(&dcache_lru_lock);
while (!list_empty(&sb->s_dentry_lru)) {
list_splice_init(&sb->s_dentry_lru, &tmp);
shrink_dentry_list(&tmp);
}
+ spin_unlock(&dcache_lru_lock);
spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(shrink_dcache_sb);
@@ -659,7 +707,9 @@ static void shrink_dcache_for_umount_subtree(struct dentry *dentry)
/* detach this root from the system */
spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
+ spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
dentry_lru_del(dentry);
+ spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
__d_drop(dentry);
spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
@@ -673,7 +723,9 @@ static void shrink_dcache_for_umount_subtree(struct dentry *dentry)
spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
list_for_each_entry(loop, &dentry->d_subdirs,
d_u.d_child) {
+ spin_lock(&loop->d_lock);
dentry_lru_del(loop);
+ spin_unlock(&loop->d_lock);
__d_drop(loop);
cond_resched_lock(&dcache_lock);
}
@@ -850,6 +902,8 @@ resume:
struct dentry *dentry = list_entry(tmp, struct dentry, d_u.d_child);
next = tmp->next;
+ spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
+
/*
* move only zero ref count dentries to the end
* of the unused list for prune_dcache
@@ -861,6 +915,8 @@ resume:
dentry_lru_del(dentry);
}
+ spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
+
/*
* We can return to the caller if we have found some (this
* ensures forward progress). We'll be coming back to find
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-27 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-27 10:15 [PATCH 00/46] rcu-walk and dcache scaling Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 02/46] fs: d_validate fixes Nick Piggin
2010-12-08 1:53 ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-08 6:59 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-09 0:50 ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-09 4:50 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 03/46] kernel: kmem_ptr_validate considered harmful Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 04/46] fs: dcache documentation cleanup Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 05/46] fs: change d_delete semantics Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 06/46] cifs: dont overwrite dentry name in d_revalidate Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 07/46] jfs: " Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 08/46] fs: change d_compare for rcu-walk Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 09/46] fs: change d_hash " Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 10/46] hostfs: simplify locking Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 11/46] fs: dcache scale hash Nick Piggin
2010-12-09 6:09 ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-09 6:28 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-09 8:17 ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-09 12:53 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-09 23:42 ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-10 2:35 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-10 9:01 ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-13 4:48 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-13 5:05 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2010-12-09 7:22 ` [PATCH 12/46] fs: dcache scale lru Dave Chinner
2010-12-09 12:34 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 13/46] fs: dcache scale dentry refcount Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 14/46] fs: dcache scale d_unhashed Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 15/46] fs: dcache scale subdirs Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 16/46] fs: scale inode alias list Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 17/46] fs: Use rename lock and RCU for multi-step operations Nick Piggin
2011-01-18 22:32 ` Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub
2011-01-18 22:42 ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-19 22:27 ` Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub
2011-01-19 22:32 ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-25 22:10 ` Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub
2011-01-27 5:18 ` Nick Piggin
2011-02-07 18:52 ` Jim Schutt
2011-02-07 21:04 ` Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub
2011-02-07 21:31 ` Jim Schutt
2011-02-07 22:25 ` Jim Schutt
2011-02-14 17:57 ` Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 18/46] fs: increase d_name lock coverage Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 19/46] fs: dcache remove dcache_lock Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 20/46] fs: dcache avoid starvation in dcache multi-step operations Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 21/46] fs: dcache reduce dput locking Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 22/46] fs: dcache reduce locking in d_alloc Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 23/46] fs: dcache reduce dcache_inode_lock Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 24/46] fs: dcache rationalise dget variants Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 25/46] fs: dcache reduce d_parent locking Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 26/46] fs: dcache reduce prune_one_dentry locking Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 27/46] fs: reduce dcache_inode_lock width in lru scanning Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 28/46] fs: use RCU in shrink_dentry_list to reduce lock nesting Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 29/46] fs: consolidate dentry kill sequence Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 30/46] fs: icache RCU free inodes Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 31/46] fs: avoid inode RCU freeing for pseudo fs Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 32/46] kernel: optimise seqlock Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 33/46] fs: rcu-walk for path lookup Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 34/46] fs: fs_struct use seqlock Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 35/46] fs: dcache remove d_mounted Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 36/46] fs: dcache reduce branches in lookup path Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 37/46] fs: cache optimise dentry and inode for rcu-walk Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 38/46] fs: prefetch inode data in dcache lookup Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 39/46] fs: d_revalidate_rcu for rcu-walk Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 40/46] fs: provide rcu-walk aware permission i_ops Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 41/46] fs: provide simple rcu-walk ACL implementation Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 42/46] kernel: add bl_list Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 43/46] bit_spinlock: add required includes Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 44/46] fs: dcache per-bucket dcache hash locking Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 45/46] fs: dcache per-inode inode alias locking Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 46/46] fs: improve scalability of pseudo filesystems Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 9:56 ` [PATCH 01/46] Revert "fs: use RCU read side protection in d_validate" Nick Piggin
2010-12-08 1:16 ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-08 9:38 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-09 0:44 ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-09 4:38 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-09 5:16 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 15:04 ` [PATCH 00/46] rcu-walk and dcache scaling Anca Emanuel
2010-11-28 3:28 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-28 6:24 ` Sedat Dilek
2010-12-01 18:03 ` David Miller
2010-12-03 16:55 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-07 11:25 ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-07 15:24 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-07 15:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-07 15:59 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-07 16:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 3:28 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-07 21:56 ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-08 1:47 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-08 3:32 ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-08 4:28 ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-08 7:09 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-10 20:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-12 14:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=73262b3142d9650bcebd67ad301b36553ce8924f.1290852959.git.npiggin@kernel.dk \
--to=npiggin@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®