From: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/entry/64/compat: Preserve r8-r11 in int $0x80
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 19:13:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7332768e-8afd-980b-19ee-0a9fadf2d625@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrU3KLXwToBTOTnHpKrUhENFUVFJbWxfiPMbs2iQHoDDZA@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/18/2018 06:53 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 8:00 AM, Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> wrote:
>> This means that the new behavior is there for some 8 years already.
>> Whoever was impacted by it, probably already switched to the new ABI.
>>
>> Current ABI is "weaker", it allows kernel to save fewer registers.
>>
>> Which is generally a good thing, since saving/restoring things cost
>> cycles, and sometimes painful on entry paths where you may desperately
>> need a scratch register or two. (Recall this one? -
>> ...
>> movq %rsp, PER_CPU_VAR(rsp_scratch)
>> movq PER_CPU_VAR(cpu_current_top_of_stack), %rsp
>> /* Construct struct pt_regs on stack */
>> pushq $__USER_DS /* pt_regs->ss */
>> pushq PER_CPU_VAR(rsp_scratch) /* pt_regs->sp */
>> ...
>> wouldn't it be _great_ if one of GPRs would be available here
>> to hold userspace %rsp?
>> )
>
> But this is the int $0x80 entry, which uses the stack sanely and
> doesn't have this problem at all.
It was a general point why not committing to save every register
may help on the callee (in this case kernel) side.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-18 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-17 14:36 Andy Lutomirski
2018-04-17 15:00 ` Denys Vlasenko
2018-04-18 16:53 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-04-18 17:13 ` Denys Vlasenko [this message]
2018-04-23 12:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-04-27 15:12 ` [tip:x86/pti] " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7332768e-8afd-980b-19ee-0a9fadf2d625@redhat.com \
--to=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®