mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	jeremyfertic@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Kconfig dependency issue on function-graph tracer and frame pointer on arm
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 22:37:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7333cd3b85b47d5f28d7652031b2b1b1@agner.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a2xf9Lp=apuAE5zo+4GHQHjDTeJUh8gkCOWeotsQXRaNA@mail.gmail.com>

On 15.04.2019 14:28, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 3:35 PM Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> <linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> 
>> The subsequent hunks remove the defaulting of the choice according to
>> the function graph tracer - this is not a "hint" where the user can
>> still choose either option irrespective of the state of the function
>> graph tracer.  They should only be able to select the frame pointer
>> option in that case.
>>
>> Another way forward would be for someone to put the work in to making
>> the function graph tracer work without frame pointers.
> 
> I think Stefan was already looking into making CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER
> work with clang. I don't know what the status of that work is, but I
> think getting
> FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER working at the same time would be best.

Function Tracer is currently blocked by buggy mcount implemention on
Clang side. I do have a hacked up version which works with the buggy
Clang implementation, but not something we want to merge IMHO. see also:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33845

> 
> I never noticed the Kconfig issue here, because I was using a patch to
> turn off FUNCTION_TRACER on ARM with clang to make it build, and that
> turns off FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER in the process.
> 
>> So, how about this:
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>> index 850b4805e2d1..9aed25a6019b 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ config ARM
>>         select HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS if (CPU_V6 || CPU_V6K || CPU_V7) && MMU
>>         select HAVE_EXIT_THREAD
>>         select HAVE_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD if !XIP_KERNEL
>> -       select HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER if !THUMB2_KERNEL
>> +       select HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER if !THUMB2_KERNEL && !CC_IS_CLANG
>>         select HAVE_FUNCTION_TRACER if !XIP_KERNEL

I think due to the fact above, we should add  && !CC_IS_CLANG here too.

>>         select HAVE_GCC_PLUGINS
>>         select HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT if PERF_EVENTS && (CPU_V6 || CPU_V6K || CPU_V7)
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
>> index 6d6e0330930b..e388af4594a6 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
>> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
>> @@ -47,8 +47,8 @@ config DEBUG_WX
>>
>>  choice
>>         prompt "Choose kernel unwinder"
>> -       default UNWINDER_ARM if AEABI && !FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
>> -       default UNWINDER_FRAME_POINTER if !AEABI || FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
>> +       default UNWINDER_ARM if AEABI
>> +       default UNWINDER_FRAME_POINTER if !AEABI
>>         help
>>           This determines which method will be used for unwinding kernel stack
>>           traces for panics, oopses, bugs, warnings, perf, /proc/<pid>/stack,
>> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ config UNWINDER_FRAME_POINTER
>>
>>  config UNWINDER_ARM
>>         bool "ARM EABI stack unwinder"
>> -       depends on AEABI
>> +       depends on AEABI && !FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
>>         select ARM_UNWIND
>>         help
>>           This option enables stack unwinding support in the kernel
> 
> This looks good to me in the meantime, at least if there is any
> way to get the non-graph FUNCTION_TRACER to build with clang.

Looks sensible to me too.

Note that a similar issue came up a while ago on the mailing list:
https://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=154739414703313&w=2
[added Jeremy]

Unfortunately this never really materialized in a mergeable patch.

--
Stefan





      reply	other threads:[~2019-04-23 20:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-14 10:47 Masami Hiramatsu
2019-04-14 13:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-04-14 14:52   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-04-14 15:37     ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-04-14 23:54       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-04-15 12:28   ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-04-23 20:37     ` Stefan Agner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7333cd3b85b47d5f28d7652031b2b1b1@agner.ch \
    --to=stefan@agner.ch \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=jeremyfertic@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®