mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andriy Tryshnivskyy <andriy.tryshnivskyy@opensynergy.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: jbhayana@google.com, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	linux-iio <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Vasyl.Vavrychuk@opensynergy.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] iio: test: Add check against NULL for buffer in tests.
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 20:23:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7340aacf-bd18-dfaa-a422-490b0a701020@opensynergy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211127185300.23b4f0df@jic23-huawei>

Thank you very much!

Best regards,
Andriy

On 27.11.21 20:53, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization.
> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
>
>
> On Sat, 13 Nov 2021 16:52:14 +0000
> Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 12:16:40 +0200
>> Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 12:05 PM Andriy Tryshnivskyy
>>> <andriy.tryshnivskyy@opensynergy.com> wrote:
>>>> Add KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buf) for every test.
>>>> Also use ARRAY_SIZE(values) where it is possible.
>>> Strictly speaking 'also' and similar in the commit message means you
>>> have to split. Here are two patches in one. But these are test cases
>>> and I don't care so much about the rules. Up to maintainers.
>> Ideally I'd agree, but sometimes it's just not worth wasting anyones time
>> if both parts are mechanical as here.
>>
>> Given this is Lars' code I'll leave a bit longer for him to give any tags
>> he wishes before picking it up.
>>
>> Give me a poke if I seem to have lost it in a few weeks.  In theory I
>> shouldn't given I'm using patchwork as a backup tracker these days, but
>> meh - I've lost series before!
> Enough time I think. Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out
> as testing for 0-day to have a quick sanity check.  I'll push it out so
> linux-next picks it up later in the week.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Andriy Tryshnivskyy <andriy.tryshnivskyy@opensynergy.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   drivers/iio/test/iio-test-format.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++------------
>>>>   1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/test/iio-test-format.c b/drivers/iio/test/iio-test-format.c
>>>> index f1e951eddb43..b746d00bc0ea 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/iio/test/iio-test-format.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/iio/test/iio-test-format.c
>>>> @@ -14,10 +14,13 @@
>>>>
>>>>   static void iio_test_iio_format_value_integer(struct kunit *test)
>>>>   {
>>>> -       char *buf = kunit_kmalloc(test, PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> +       char *buf;
>>>>          int val;
>>>>          int ret;
>>>>
>>>> +       buf = kunit_kmalloc(test, PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> +       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buf);
>>>> +
>>>>          val = 42;
>>>>          ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_INT, 1, &val);
>>>>          IIO_TEST_FORMAT_EXPECT_EQ(test, buf, ret, "42\n");
>>>> @@ -41,142 +44,154 @@ static void iio_test_iio_format_value_integer(struct kunit *test)
>>>>
>>>>   static void iio_test_iio_format_value_fixedpoint(struct kunit *test)
>>>>   {
>>>> -       char *buf = kunit_kmalloc(test, PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>          int values[2];
>>>> +       char *buf;
>>>>          int ret;
>>>>
>>>> +       buf = kunit_kmalloc(test, PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> +       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buf);
>>>> +
>>>>          /* positive >= 1 */
>>>>          values[0] = 1;
>>>>          values[1] = 10;
>>>>
>>>> -       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO, 2, values);
>>>> +       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO, ARRAY_SIZE(values), values);
>>>>          IIO_TEST_FORMAT_EXPECT_EQ(test, buf, ret, "1.000010\n");
>>>>
>>>> -       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO_DB, 2, values);
>>>> +       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO_DB, ARRAY_SIZE(values), values);
>>>>          IIO_TEST_FORMAT_EXPECT_EQ(test, buf, ret, "1.000010 dB\n");
>>>>
>>>> -       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO, 2, values);
>>>> +       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO, ARRAY_SIZE(values), values);
>>>>          IIO_TEST_FORMAT_EXPECT_EQ(test, buf, ret, "1.000000010\n");
>>>>
>>>>          /* positive < 1 */
>>>>          values[0] = 0;
>>>>          values[1] = 12;
>>>>
>>>> -       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO, 2, values);
>>>> +       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO, ARRAY_SIZE(values), values);
>>>>          IIO_TEST_FORMAT_EXPECT_EQ(test, buf, ret, "0.000012\n");
>>>>
>>>> -       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO_DB, 2, values);
>>>> +       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO_DB, ARRAY_SIZE(values), values);
>>>>          IIO_TEST_FORMAT_EXPECT_EQ(test, buf, ret, "0.000012 dB\n");
>>>>
>>>> -       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO, 2, values);
>>>> +       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO, ARRAY_SIZE(values), values);
>>>>          IIO_TEST_FORMAT_EXPECT_EQ(test, buf, ret, "0.000000012\n");
>>>>
>>>>          /* negative <= -1 */
>>>>          values[0] = -1;
>>>>          values[1] = 10;
>>>>
>>>> -       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO, 2, values);
>>>> +       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO, ARRAY_SIZE(values), values);
>>>>          IIO_TEST_FORMAT_EXPECT_EQ(test, buf, ret, "-1.000010\n");
>>>>
>>>> -       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO_DB, 2, values);
>>>> +       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO_DB, ARRAY_SIZE(values), values);
>>>>          IIO_TEST_FORMAT_EXPECT_EQ(test, buf, ret, "-1.000010 dB\n");
>>>>
>>>> -       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO, 2, values);
>>>> +       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO, ARRAY_SIZE(values), values);
>>>>          IIO_TEST_FORMAT_EXPECT_EQ(test, buf, ret, "-1.000000010\n");
>>>>
>>>>          /* negative > -1 */
>>>>          values[0] = 0;
>>>>          values[1] = -123;
>>>> -       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO, 2, values);
>>>> +       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO, ARRAY_SIZE(values), values);
>>>>          IIO_TEST_FORMAT_EXPECT_EQ(test, buf, ret, "-0.000123\n");
>>>>
>>>> -       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO_DB, 2, values);
>>>> +       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO_DB, ARRAY_SIZE(values), values);
>>>>          IIO_TEST_FORMAT_EXPECT_EQ(test, buf, ret, "-0.000123 dB\n");
>>>>
>>>> -       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO, 2, values);
>>>> +       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO, ARRAY_SIZE(values), values);
>>>>          IIO_TEST_FORMAT_EXPECT_EQ(test, buf, ret, "-0.000000123\n");
>>>>   }
>>>>
>>>>   static void iio_test_iio_format_value_fractional(struct kunit *test)
>>>>   {
>>>> -       char *buf = kunit_kmalloc(test, PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>          int values[2];
>>>> +       char *buf;
>>>>          int ret;
>>>>
>>>> +       buf = kunit_kmalloc(test, PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> +       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buf);
>>>> +
>>>>          /* positive < 1 */
>>>>          values[0] = 1;
>>>>          values[1] = 10;
>>>> -       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL, 2, values);
>>>> +       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL, ARRAY_SIZE(values), values);
>>>>          IIO_TEST_FORMAT_EXPECT_EQ(test, buf, ret, "0.100000000\n");
>>>>
>>>>          /* positive >= 1 */
>>>>          values[0] = 100;
>>>>          values[1] = 3;
>>>> -       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL, 2, values);
>>>> +       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL, ARRAY_SIZE(values), values);
>>>>          IIO_TEST_FORMAT_EXPECT_EQ(test, buf, ret, "33.333333333\n");
>>>>
>>>>          /* negative > -1 */
>>>>          values[0] = -1;
>>>>          values[1] = 1000000000;
>>>> -       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL, 2, values);
>>>> +       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL, ARRAY_SIZE(values), values);
>>>>          IIO_TEST_FORMAT_EXPECT_EQ(test, buf, ret, "-0.000000001\n");
>>>>
>>>>          /* negative <= -1 */
>>>>          values[0] = -200;
>>>>          values[1] = 3;
>>>> -       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL, 2, values);
>>>> +       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL, ARRAY_SIZE(values), values);
>>>>          IIO_TEST_FORMAT_EXPECT_EQ(test, buf, ret, "-66.666666666\n");
>>>>
>>>>          /* Zero */
>>>>          values[0] = 0;
>>>>          values[1] = -10;
>>>> -       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL, 2, values);
>>>> +       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL, ARRAY_SIZE(values), values);
>>>>          IIO_TEST_FORMAT_EXPECT_EQ(test, buf, ret, "0.000000000\n");
>>>>   }
>>>>
>>>>   static void iio_test_iio_format_value_fractional_log2(struct kunit *test)
>>>>   {
>>>> -       char *buf = kunit_kmalloc(test, PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>          int values[2];
>>>> +       char *buf;
>>>>          int ret;
>>>>
>>>> +       buf = kunit_kmalloc(test, PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> +       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buf);
>>>> +
>>>>          /* positive < 1 */
>>>>          values[0] = 123;
>>>>          values[1] = 10;
>>>> -       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2, 2, values);
>>>> +       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2, ARRAY_SIZE(values), values);
>>>>          IIO_TEST_FORMAT_EXPECT_EQ(test, buf, ret, "0.120117187\n");
>>>>
>>>>          /* positive >= 1 */
>>>>          values[0] = 1234567;
>>>>          values[1] = 10;
>>>> -       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2, 2, values);
>>>> +       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2, ARRAY_SIZE(values), values);
>>>>          IIO_TEST_FORMAT_EXPECT_EQ(test, buf, ret, "1205.631835937\n");
>>>>
>>>>          /* negative > -1 */
>>>>          values[0] = -123;
>>>>          values[1] = 10;
>>>> -       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2, 2, values);
>>>> +       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2, ARRAY_SIZE(values), values);
>>>>          IIO_TEST_FORMAT_EXPECT_EQ(test, buf, ret, "-0.120117187\n");
>>>>
>>>>          /* negative <= -1 */
>>>>          values[0] = -1234567;
>>>>          values[1] = 10;
>>>> -       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2, 2, values);
>>>> +       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2, ARRAY_SIZE(values), values);
>>>>          IIO_TEST_FORMAT_EXPECT_EQ(test, buf, ret, "-1205.631835937\n");
>>>>
>>>>          /* Zero */
>>>>          values[0] = 0;
>>>>          values[1] = 10;
>>>> -       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2, 2, values);
>>>> +       ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2, ARRAY_SIZE(values), values);
>>>>          IIO_TEST_FORMAT_EXPECT_EQ(test, buf, ret, "0.000000000\n");
>>>>   }
>>>>
>>>>   static void iio_test_iio_format_value_multiple(struct kunit *test)
>>>>   {
>>>> -       char *buf = kunit_kmalloc(test, PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>          int values[] = {1, -2, 3, -4, 5};
>>>> +       char *buf;
>>>>          int ret;
>>>>
>>>> +       buf = kunit_kmalloc(test, PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> +       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buf);
>>>> +
>>>>          ret = iio_format_value(buf, IIO_VAL_INT_MULTIPLE,
>>>>                                 ARRAY_SIZE(values), values);
>>>>          IIO_TEST_FORMAT_EXPECT_EQ(test, buf, ret, "1 -2 3 -4 5 \n");
>>>> --
>>>> 2.17.1
>>>>
>>>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-28 18:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-05 10:04 [PATCH v1 0/2] iio: test: Add test for IIO_VAL_INT_64 Andriy Tryshnivskyy
2021-11-05 10:05 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] iio: test: Add check against NULL for buffer in tests Andriy Tryshnivskyy
2021-11-05 10:16   ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-13 16:52     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-11-27 18:53       ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-11-28 18:23         ` Andriy Tryshnivskyy [this message]
2021-11-05 10:05 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] iio: test: Add test for IIO_VAL_INT_64 Andriy Tryshnivskyy
2021-11-05 20:20   ` kernel test robot
2021-11-05 10:17 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] " Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-05 10:26   ` Andriy Tryshnivskyy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7340aacf-bd18-dfaa-a422-490b0a701020@opensynergy.com \
    --to=andriy.tryshnivskyy@opensynergy.com \
    --cc=Vasyl.Vavrychuk@opensynergy.com \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=jbhayana@google.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®