From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752378AbdHOPqj (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2017 11:46:39 -0400 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:39551 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751031AbdHOPqi (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2017 11:46:38 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] thunderbolt: fix incorrect value assigned to req->response_type To: Dan Carpenter , Mika Westerberg References: <20170815143133.26500-1-colin.king@canonical.com> <20170815143834.GL2369@lahna.fi.intel.com> <20170815152259.idjvtw5tdg24xj2o@mwanda> Cc: Andreas Noever , Michael Jamet , Yehezkel Bernat , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman From: Colin Ian King Message-ID: <735914a9-3d8f-7d98-35c3-6e2e046e70c2@canonical.com> Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 16:46:35 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170815152259.idjvtw5tdg24xj2o@mwanda> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 15/08/17 16:22, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 05:38:34PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 03:31:33PM +0100, Colin King wrote: >>> From: Colin Ian King >>> >>> req->response_type is being assigned the sizeof TB_CFG_PKG_RESET >>> and should actually be assigned TB_CFG_PKG_RESET. Fix this. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King >> >> IIRC I already acked this some time ago ;-) >> >> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg >> >> BTW, you should CC Greg as he has been gathering Thunderbolt related >> patches. I added him now. > > Yeah. I sent this patch on Jun 14. "[PATCH] thunderbolt: Fix reset > response_type" I didn't CC Greg, either. Someone should probably > update MAINTAINERS if Greg needs to get these emails. > > Colin, could you please add Fixes tags to your patches? Will do. > It helps me > investigate how bugs are introduced. I know we all had a long thread > and agreed to not add them if the patch probably doesn't fix a user > visible bug, but this one is clearly a bugfix. Since you fixed this back in Jun, will you re-send your original fix? Colin > > regards, > dan carpenter >