From: Igor Russkikh <irusskikh@marvell.com>
To: Grant Grundler <grundler@chromium.org>,
Dmitrii Bezrukov <dbezrukov@marvell.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Aashay Shringarpure <aashay@google.com>,
"Yi Chou" <yich@google.com>,
Shervin Oloumi <enlightened@google.com>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 0/5] net: atlantic: more fuzzing fixes
Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 09:11:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <735b9c21-6a8f-0f28-d11d-bd9bbd78986b@marvell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANEJEGuVwMa9ufwBM817dnbUxBghM0mcsPvrwx1vAWLoZ+CLaA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Grant and Dmitrii,
>> So to close session I guess need to set is_rsc_completed to true when
>> number of frags is going to exceed value MAX_SKB_FRAGS, then packet will
>> be built and submitted to stack.
>> But of course need to check that there will not be any other corner cases
>> with this new change.
>
> Ok. Sounds like I should post a v2 then and just drop 1/5 and 5/5
> patches. Will post that tomorrow.
I think the part with check `hw_head_ >= ring->size` still can be used safely (patch 5).
For patch 1 - I agree it may make things worse, so either drop or think on how to interpret invalid `next` and stop LRO session.
Thanks,
Igor
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-05 7:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-18 23:17 Grant Grundler
2022-04-18 23:17 ` [PATCH 1/5] net: atlantic: limit buff_ring index value Grant Grundler
2022-04-18 23:17 ` [PATCH 2/5] net: atlantic: fix "frag[0] not initialized" Grant Grundler
2022-04-18 23:17 ` [PATCH 3/5] net: atlantic: reduce scope of is_rsc_complete Grant Grundler
2022-04-18 23:17 ` [PATCH 4/5] net: atlantic: add check for MAX_SKB_FRAGS Grant Grundler
2022-04-18 23:17 ` [PATCH 5/5] net: atlantic: verify hw_head_ is reasonable Grant Grundler
2022-04-21 19:53 ` [PATCH 0/5] net: atlantic: more fuzzing fixes Grant Grundler
2022-04-26 16:00 ` [EXT] " Igor Russkikh
2022-04-26 17:20 ` Grant Grundler
2022-05-03 11:14 ` Dmitrii Bezrukov
2022-05-03 18:07 ` Grant Grundler
2022-05-04 14:39 ` Dmitrii Bezrukov
2022-05-04 20:11 ` Grant Grundler
2022-05-05 7:11 ` Igor Russkikh [this message]
2022-05-05 20:57 ` Grant Grundler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=735b9c21-6a8f-0f28-d11d-bd9bbd78986b@marvell.com \
--to=irusskikh@marvell.com \
--cc=aashay@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dbezrukov@marvell.com \
--cc=enlightened@google.com \
--cc=grundler@chromium.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=yich@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®