Re: [PATCH net-next] xsk: Return -EINVAL instead of -EBUSY after xsk_get_pool_from_qid() fails

["wanghai (M)" <wanghai38@huawei.com>]

Sorry, I misunderstood here, this is a faulty patch and no changes are 
needed here. Please ignore this patch

在 2021/6/2 16:29, Magnus Karlsson 写道:
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 6:02 AM Wang Hai <wanghai38@huawei.com> wrote:
>> xsk_get_pool_from_qid() fails not because the device's queues are busy,
>> but because the queue_id exceeds the current number of queues.
>> So when it fails, it is better to return -EINVAL instead of -EBUSY.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wanghai38@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c b/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c
>> index 8de01aaac4a0..30ece117117a 100644
>> --- a/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c
>> +++ b/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c
>> @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ int xp_assign_dev(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool,
>>                  return -EINVAL;
>>
>>          if (xsk_get_pool_from_qid(netdev, queue_id))
>> -               return -EBUSY;
>> +               return -EINVAL;
> I guess your intent here is to return -EINVAL only when the queue_id
> is larger than the number of active queues.

Yes, I just confirmed that this has been implemented in xp_assign_dev().

int xp_assign_dev()

{

...

     err = xsk_reg_pool_at_qid(netdev, pool, queue_id);

     if (err)

         return err;     //return -EINVAL;

...

}

> But this patch also
> changes the return code when the queue id is already in use and in
> that case we should continue to return -EBUSY. As this function is
> used by a number of drivers, the easiest way to accomplish this is to
> introduce a test for queue_id out of bounds before this if-statement
> and return -EINVAL there.
>
>>          pool->netdev = netdev;
>>          pool->queue_id = queue_id;
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
> .
>