mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
To: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
	Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
	Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 09/11] KVM: arm64: Flush only the memslot after write-protect
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2023 10:35:28 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <73a4655a-2c63-3209-1153-2fc816e8990e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230621175002.2832640-10-rananta@google.com>

On 6/22/23 03:50, Raghavendra Rao Ananta wrote:
> After write-protecting the region, currently KVM invalidates
> the entire TLB entries using kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(). Instead,
> scope the invalidation only to the targeted memslot. If
> supported, the architecture would use the range-based TLBI
> instructions to flush the memslot or else fallback to flushing
> all of the TLBs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 

Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index c3ec2141c3284..94f10e670c100 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -992,7 +992,7 @@ static void kvm_mmu_wp_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm, int slot)
>   	write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>   	stage2_wp_range(&kvm->arch.mmu, start, end);
>   	write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> -	kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
> +	kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(kvm, memslot);
>   }
>   
>   /**


  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-05  0:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-21 17:49 [RESEND PATCH v5 00/11] KVM: arm64: Add support for FEAT_TLBIRANGE Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-06-21 17:49 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 01/11] KVM: Rename kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlb() to kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-04 23:23   ` Gavin Shan
2023-06-21 17:49 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 02/11] KVM: arm64: Use kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-04 23:38   ` Gavin Shan
2023-07-05 18:16     ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-06-21 17:49 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 03/11] KVM: Allow range-based TLB invalidation from common code Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-04 23:54   ` Gavin Shan
2023-06-21 17:49 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 04/11] KVM: Move kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot() to " Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-04 23:57   ` Gavin Shan
2023-06-21 17:49 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 05/11] arm64: tlb: Refactor the core flush algorithm of __flush_tlb_range Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-05  0:10   ` Gavin Shan
2023-07-05 18:21     ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-06-21 17:49 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 06/11] KVM: arm64: Implement __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_range() Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-05  0:16   ` Gavin Shan
2023-06-21 17:49 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 07/11] KVM: arm64: Define kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_range() Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-05  0:31   ` Gavin Shan
2023-07-05 18:28     ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-06  0:04       ` Gavin Shan
2023-07-13 18:47         ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-14  1:02           ` Gavin Shan
2023-06-21 17:49 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 08/11] KVM: arm64: Implement kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_range() Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-05  0:33   ` Gavin Shan
2023-06-21 17:50 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 09/11] KVM: arm64: Flush only the memslot after write-protect Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-05  0:35   ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2023-06-21 17:50 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 10/11] KVM: arm64: Invalidate the table entries upon a range Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-05  0:51   ` Gavin Shan
2023-06-21 17:50 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 11/11] KVM: arm64: Use TLBI range-based intructions for unmap Raghavendra Rao Ananta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=73a4655a-2c63-3209-1153-2fc816e8990e@redhat.com \
    --to=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
    --cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rananta@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®