From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Aditya Garg <gargaditya08@live.com>
Cc: Atharva Tiwari <evepolonium@gmail.com>,
Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@bitmath.org>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
"linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Orlando Chamberlain <orlandoch.dev@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hwmom/applesmc: add imacpro
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 11:36:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <74114528-3c5c-47fd-bcbb-3e8b9bcb6669@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7D2F2DB0-E94C-4372-9285-A91C4C856934@live.com>
Hi Aditya,
On 1/29/25 10:22, Aditya Garg wrote:
> Hi Guenter
>
> Sorry to barge in like that but I have some issues with this here.
>
No worries. Thanks for stepping in.
> 1. The iMacPro1,1 is a T2 Mac and the applesmc driver does not support T2 Macs upstream, thus making no point of adding this. We at t2linux have downstream patches to support T2 Macs, but we do not aim to upstream them since we wish to use a separate, and better driver for the SMC on T2 Macs.
>
> 2. The person who submitted the patch took it from the t2linux project, of which I am a part of, but didn't care to even credit the original author of the patch. I’m not sure how legal it is to redistribute the code in his own name and removing the original author’s name without taking permission from the author as per the GPL2 license, but I think the author should be credited. In fact the original patch was Signed-off-by the original author.
>
> For reference, the original patch, which we never intended to be sent upstream, is given over here:
>
> https://github.com/t2linux/linux-t2-patches/blob/main/3007-applesmc-Add-iMacPro-to-applesmc_whitelist.patch
>
FWIW, that patch looks much better than this patch.
I am a bit confused, though: You are saying above that the patch is pointless.
Is that because context patches adding support for T2 are missing ?
Also, what about the patch at [1] ? It also adds t2 specific functionality,
and it seems to match another patch from the t2linux project.
Is that also missing some context ?
> I leave the fate of this to you now.
>
Thanks for letting me know. I dropped the patch. I'll also wait for your feedback
about the patch at [1] before looking into it further.
Thanks,
Guenter
---
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-hwmon/patch/20250120183343.3494-1-evepolonium@gmail.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-29 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-23 12:17 Atharva Tiwari
2025-01-29 16:06 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-01-29 16:23 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-01-29 18:22 ` Aditya Garg
2025-01-29 19:36 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2025-01-30 3:54 ` Aditya Garg
2025-01-30 5:07 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-01-30 11:31 ` Aditya Garg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=74114528-3c5c-47fd-bcbb-3e8b9bcb6669@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=evepolonium@gmail.com \
--cc=gargaditya08@live.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=orlandoch.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=rydberg@bitmath.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®