Re: [PATCH] HID: sensor-hub: Fix typo and improve documentation for sensor_hub_remove_callback()

[David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>]

On 5/1/25 6:33 PM, chelsy ratnawat wrote:
> Hi, 

Watch out for HTML mail! The mailing list and other automated tools will reject
it, so some people won't see the whole conversation.

> Thanks for the feedback. Regarding your comments:
> 
> On Thu, May 1, 2025 at 12:47 AM David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com <mailto:dlechner@baylibre.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On 4/30/25 1:23 PM, Chelsy Ratnawat wrote:
>     > Fixed a typo in "registered" and improved grammar for better readability
>     > and consistency with kernel-doc standards. No functional changes.
>     >
>     > Signed-off-by: Chelsy Ratnawat <chelsyratnawat2001@gmail.com <mailto:chelsyratnawat2001@gmail.com>>
>     > ---
>     >  include/linux/hid-sensor-hub.h | 7 ++++---
>     >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>     >
>     > diff --git a/include/linux/hid-sensor-hub.h b/include/linux/hid-sensor-hub.h
>     > index c27329e2a5ad..5d2ac79429d4 100644
>     > --- a/include/linux/hid-sensor-hub.h
>     > +++ b/include/linux/hid-sensor-hub.h
>     > @@ -130,10 +130,11 @@ int sensor_hub_register_callback(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev,
>     >  /**
>     >  * sensor_hub_remove_callback() - Remove client callbacks
> 
>     This says "callbacks", so is it possible to have more than one registered at a
>     time?
> 
>    
>    Regarding the use of "callback" instead of "callbacks", what I understand is- 
>    - The function `sensor_hub_register_callback()` ensures that only one callback is registered for each `(hsdev, usage_id)` pair. If another callback is registered for the same `(hsdev, usage_id)`, it returns `-EINVAL`.
>    - Therefore, `sensor_hub_remove_callback()` is designed to remove that single registered callback for a given `(hsdev, usage_id)` pair. The function does not need to handle multiple callbacks for the same pair, as only one
>      callback is registered at a time. 
>     
>    Please let me know if my understanding is correct, or if you have any additional feedback or suggestions.

Based on the reply from Srinivas, it sounds like you understand correctly.