From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1056C54EAA for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 15:33:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234549AbjA0Pdl (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jan 2023 10:33:41 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59680 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234553AbjA0Pdg (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jan 2023 10:33:36 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x32b.google.com (mail-wm1-x32b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28D0C820D0 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 07:33:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x32b.google.com with SMTP id e19-20020a05600c439300b003db1cac0c1fso5650895wmn.5 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 07:33:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=BNGvS2ID0Pc1q19b8jVCARHoPS77fpPLbsMdQVhJjRU=; b=jupml07bP3Bg4HgWDYrj5yhkar2XTFy/mzaT7nmJaAKRDc7HajJAQSLRasOIEMYbgW toa5tC6p4fdIli6TzFjsiLoQYK6kIerLkRffjHfjfNsKfk5JNnr/sAsYCbMevPU7GNX1 oT/3+f8ZqRAp3AW6ihO1j6D6HNirmOVn+W36iy+fpPuNOx0RIdlcG+eYPTPz8MH6Wvzs gi2B464Dj9KV3uZ69Se4zf/l6ijENcoFZt7cFy9HqhxO8Zy+yB0f1c55lD4QwWfEUzyF qK3f29c4U8gAG3B2ck+j5p2gKUHXNCRjV2dI9gGRukoUT6PQSvKWbM49vHgSYsap8Dwa ZXmw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=BNGvS2ID0Pc1q19b8jVCARHoPS77fpPLbsMdQVhJjRU=; b=hMHS0t/PSP1ZsDs8SV8OLMJpdLTjkK9/Y2UEU1khOA1LtdDmzD9axgo/nkfnEXrlRM QMDLx/5wL4fTOQRm1EW01v98blGmllQ/NCBnKJ7+q9isZl0aHQztKgcMHqzy6qEYH6YW 9R4nSe4qHnL0G73O4HolgKisjcK32ujwCTj3grS5QPPSVTCufJjs2dn9xIb6fYZcowm3 IkOahxckcBl9ngnoweNEnE1QboubuccPgjoQT60F3Ict3wRhdxOWADGxniXFRqjPENP2 ZP2YPSNVYGbcII3ojfiTAwESaU8cbAi+wmAmEIFjQKHianjOOJ5FZKv2YD07zS7JpyMv DAdA== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2ko7IQTwzU6w/pcRbEgcCp+zPAASr1m2CMB9h3ROGIGm+kYo28Jn dgMEbGiXF55C1KypDDNwlpALqA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXtB+suh5m7saotaP8clkeCqLgJ+9SlofDAlsQ/ZtH13Uj0zCpjo1eW7fJyzu6be3Zzr1nS+3A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:995:b0:3da:f4f5:ad0e with SMTP id w21-20020a05600c099500b003daf4f5ad0emr39233519wmp.9.1674833613373; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 07:33:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.109] ([178.197.216.144]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l16-20020a7bc350000000b003d9aa76dc6asm9724450wmj.0.2023.01.27.07.33.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 27 Jan 2023 07:33:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7428b6d9-1653-4a4a-8e12-bc7ededef8a0@linaro.org> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 16:33:31 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: Fix regulators node names Content-Language: en-US To: Abel Vesa , Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Neil Armstrong Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org References: <20230127130106.1136226-1-abel.vesa@linaro.org> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: <20230127130106.1136226-1-abel.vesa@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 27/01/2023 14:01, Abel Vesa wrote: > Bindings check fails as the schema expects the regulator node names to > have the suffix -regulators, so use the name and the id of the pmic to > compile the node name instead. > > Fixes: 71342fb91eae ("arm64: dts: qcom: Add base SM8550 MTP dts") > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa > --- No, the original code is what we requested. You are making it now incorrect (although bindings need to catch up). See: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/9e805614-8d21-4f8b-1b31-790686c95aa5@linaro.org/T/#t Best regards, Krzysztof