From: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
To: Peiyang He <peiyang_he@smail.nju.edu.cn>,
airlied@redhat.com, kraxel@redhat.com,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, gurchetansingh@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/virtio: fix memory leak of fence event on execbuffer failure
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2026 21:17:57 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7452e614-91ff-48b8-b2ee-b01285985bf4@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D320EAB5680C1411+20260908121323.2405044-1-peiyang_he@smail.nju.edu.cn>
On 9/8/26 15:13, Peiyang He wrote:
> virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl() reserves a DRM event with
> drm_event_reserve_init() when VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_RING_IDX selects a ring that
> userspace has enabled polling for. virtio_gpu_init_submit() does this
> before the BO handles, the command buffer, the syncobj arrays and the
> in-fence are processed, so every later error path runs with the event
> already pending, including plain argument validation failures such as an
> invalid bo_handle or an in-syncobj that carries no fence.
>
> On those paths, virtio_gpu_cleanup_submit() drops the out-fence without
> cancelling the event. The fence is freed without ever having been emitted,
> taking the only driver-side pointer to the event with it. Closing the DRM
> file does not help. drm_events_release() unlinks pending events but
> deliberately leaves the freeing to the driver's later drm_send_event(),
> which never runs for an orphaned event, so the allocation is leaked
> permanently.
>
> Found when fuzzing the virtio driver with Syzkaller:
>
> BUG: memory leak
> unreferenced object 0xffff88802c176e80 (size 96):
> comm "syz.1.367", pid 10561, jiffies 4294960122
> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> c8 6e 17 2c 80 88 ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 .n.,............
> backtrace (crc e1973c6b):
> kmemleak_alloc_recursive include/linux/kmemleak.h:44 [inline]
> slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:4597 [inline]
> slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:4917 [inline]
> __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x49d/0x6f0 mm/slub.c:5485
> _kmalloc_noprof include/linux/slab.h:988 [inline]
> _kzalloc_noprof include/linux/slab.h:1309 [inline]
> virtio_gpu_fence_event_create drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_submit.c:282 [inline]
> virtio_gpu_init_submit drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_submit.c:398 [inline]
> virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl+0xbbf/0x1aa0 drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_submit.c:505
> drm_ioctl_kernel+0x1f4/0x3e0 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c:817
> drm_ioctl+0x5f4/0xc70 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c:914
> vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
> __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:597 [inline]
> __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:583 [inline]
> __x64_sys_ioctl+0x18e/0x210 fs/ioctl.c:583
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0x116/0x800 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
>
> Fix by cancelling and freeing the DRM event on the execbuffer error path
> before dropping the fence. Clear the fence's event pointer after
> cancellation so it does not retain a dangling pointer.
>
> Fixes: cd7f5ca33585 ("drm/virtio: implement context init: add virtio_gpu_fence_event")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Peiyang He <peiyang_he@smail.nju.edu.cn>
> Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5.6-luna
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_submit.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_submit.c
> index 32cb1e4aa425..734b1e976a75 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_submit.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_submit.c
> @@ -538,6 +538,10 @@ int virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> virtio_gpu_process_post_deps(&submit);
> virtio_gpu_complete_submit(&submit);
> cleanup:
> + if (ret && submit.out_fence && submit.out_fence->e) {
> + drm_event_cancel_free(dev, &submit.out_fence->e->base);
> + submit.out_fence->e = NULL;
> + }
> virtio_gpu_cleanup_submit(&submit);
>
> return ret;
Applied to misc-fixes, thanks!
--
Best regards,
Dmitry
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-20 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-08 12:13 Peiyang He
2026-09-20 18:17 ` Dmitry Osipenko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7452e614-91ff-48b8-b2ee-b01285985bf4@collabora.com \
--to=dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gurchetansingh@chromium.org \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peiyang_he@smail.nju.edu.cn \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®