From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754945AbbAUQ4o (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jan 2015 11:56:44 -0500 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:52955 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753902AbbAUQwN (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jan 2015 11:52:13 -0500 From: Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda To: linux-parport@lists.infradead.org Cc: "Matwey V. Kornilov" , Ondrej Zary , Greg KH , Heiko Andreas Sommer , gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel Subject: Re: [Linux-parport] [PATCHv4 2/2] parport: parport_pc: Implement CPU model check to cut off false-positives Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 17:51:09 +0100 Message-ID: <7486641.U1I25nUFqS@soho> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.1 (Linux/3.16.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.14.2; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1405667575-3291-1-git-send-email-matwey@sai.msu.ru> <201407180931.32502.linux@rainbow-software.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4619598.OKAbMgGts4"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:A4ryvY04VJ0w64ZOo/MOQKTglXmn97fhQ+PhgAef416DzC9WPPe L2lg/aUNVPeur85zmpU+02b/lWJ1Ez9Eh03mFixBhsYA9IE1I5qm/ve+b2TFp2UeyEE5TUo PpoJusyBpxkg4dIC5vS71GKHwaAh8IdIHtrFT/mG5IPJNcMQS3YhbpFedmfb4R3NziGxZYW YG4+kIxuuYku+NmWX039w== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --nextPart4619598.OKAbMgGts4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" El Dimecres, 13 d'agost de 2014, a les 12:04:55, Matwey V. Kornilov va=20= escriure: > Hi, >=20 > What do you think, would it be better just to left the check for all > x86 32-bit hardware?. >=20 Finally, finally this patch was applied?=20 Best regards, Leopold =2D-=20 =2D- Linux User 152692 GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA Catalonia =2D------------------------------------ A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? --nextPart4619598.OKAbMgGts4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJUv9kDAAoJEAX0p6lJotmqwDAP/0+ZGqNW0CCn1bY++vrA2vfP 1frq/fDIZ2gyyBpHLTN03dFqAyj8qIJidJ/KJ6pw2UFCwrzHvamTp5/SGcps+afR LEWvr/x7zDtsY00Db/2h26QgbqypBPCf+dM06cbZxU3XSwpAaSRmWmj6AMr/Uk4u J5tl+MZtiIapLS6LxlWv9jnZHeiKqklg3yjvS3HJHntiSuq8JbwtqTRfWPHKfLBd N6sJ10gftljaOF58eGJsZoLXuXi+pZQVKDjVeej4Zbpp8TbW/+Z1PaG6g+ASybyU sDXao7nEERqUdDCep39EQ19kdDtNCkGWkO1Oc7GjpkHt+Cbo/eiwFVm3qpRTY09p RMFNnFY+A15fX80VtsbHfzjyYyLE+8QureDnPHJqrjBuCWnGxG57IybSM6Kq5tS6 1oJ7vOO19hkqoEvkNXfgPEsrgn22FnZVhMHG3JED2VyV1XqSn+ml9484G/FbTKeq qi85YMewvkNogwpnOUBcpwpiP0pOUCWFVjHZEZ/z+lVNFZ+KP8zxc+FPkamv6CWD ziqBqQdQ2mA2bwqKglXKQQ4eP4miTXm2kd22BSlCZuHXYs/IVy68xErsU/RTOnOm BKE8SjtSADNJsW30lQ56mPq7K9PZRnWFQ7gmCrLzZKoVw8Jq2uegS48I5ewZ9E5X LAfMvEsvn2mCxHkc4Evj =j+V1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4619598.OKAbMgGts4--