From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: lse-tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Performance of partial object-based rmap
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 20:25:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7490000.1045715152@[10.10.2.4]> (raw)
The performance delta between 2.5.62-mjb1 and 2.5.62-mjb2 is caused
by the partial object-based rmap patch (written by Dave McCracken).
I expect this patch to have an increasing impact on workloads with
more processes, and it should give a substantial space saving as
well as a performance increase. Results from 16x NUMA-Q system ...
Profile comparison:
before
15525 page_remove_rmap
6415 page_add_rmap
after
2055 page_add_rmap
1983 page_remove_rmap
(performance of 62 was equivalent to 61)
Kernbench-2: (make -j N vmlinux, where N = 2 x num_cpus)
Elapsed User System CPU
2.5.61 45.77 561.71 118.87 1486.50
2.5.62-mjb1 45.81 564.41 112.76 1478.00
2.5.62-mjb2 44.88 563.64 98.29 1474.50
Kernbench-16: (make -j N vmlinux, where N = 16 x num_cpus)
Elapsed User System CPU
2.5.61 47.46 565.70 144.77 1496.33
2.5.62-mjb1 47.21 569.17 139.55 1500.67
2.5.62-mjb2 46.09 568.19 121.83 1496.67
DISCLAIMER: SPEC(tm) and the benchmark name SDET(tm) are registered
trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. This
benchmarking was performed for research purposes only, and the run results
are non-compliant and not-comparable with any published results.
Results are shown as percentages of the first set displayed
SDET 1 (see disclaimer)
Throughput Std. Dev
2.5.61 100.0% 4.5%
2.5.62-mjb1 95.2% 3.0%
2.5.62-mjb2 97.1% 4.6%
SDET 2 (see disclaimer)
Throughput Std. Dev
2.5.61 100.0% 4.3%
2.5.62-mjb1 93.4% 6.6%
2.5.62-mjb2 99.4% 6.1%
SDET 4 (see disclaimer)
Throughput Std. Dev
2.5.61 100.0% 2.4%
2.5.62-mjb1 101.9% 7.1%
2.5.62-mjb2 116.9% 1.5%
SDET 8 (see disclaimer)
Throughput Std. Dev
2.5.61 100.0% 7.4%
2.5.62-mjb1 111.1% 1.8%
2.5.62-mjb2 121.8% 5.9%
SDET 16 (see disclaimer)
Throughput Std. Dev
2.5.61 100.0% 2.0%
2.5.62-mjb1 105.0% 2.2%
2.5.62-mjb2 107.0% 2.1%
SDET 32 (see disclaimer)
Throughput Std. Dev
2.5.61 100.0% 7.9%
2.5.62-mjb1 112.4% 1.2%
2.5.62-mjb2 116.8% 0.9%
SDET 64 (see disclaimer)
Throughput Std. Dev
2.5.61 100.0% 1.2%
2.5.62-mjb1 111.0% 0.7%
2.5.62-mjb2 116.0% 0.9%
next reply other threads:[~2003-02-20 4:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-20 4:25 Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2003-02-20 4:47 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-02-20 5:14 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-20 5:16 ` [Lse-tech] " William Lee Irwin III
2003-02-20 5:27 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-21 1:44 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-21 3:08 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-21 3:25 ` Rik van Riel
2003-02-21 3:47 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-21 4:25 ` Rik van Riel
2003-02-21 10:00 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-02-21 19:15 ` [Lse-tech] " William Lee Irwin III
2003-02-21 19:27 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-02-21 3:32 ` Martin J. Bligh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='7490000.1045715152@[10.10.2.4]' \
--to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®