From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usbnet: do not count empty skbs as errors in rx_process()
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 14:15:29 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <749423.9282.qm@web180313.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201009112222.06149.linux@rainbow-software.org>
--- On Sat, 9/11/10, Ondrej Zary wrote:
> Date: Saturday, September 11, 2010, 1:22 PM
> On Saturday 11 September 2010
> 21:07:59 David Brownell wrote:
>
> > NAK to this backwards-incompatible change.
> >
> > >
> > > This is needed for cx82310_eth.
Backwards-incompatible changes are NOT "needed"
> >
> > I'd far rather see that driver fixed, than see
> > the core usbnet framework broken to avoid such
> > fixes to a very new driver ...
>
> I already tried to explain that the driver is not broken
Yet you keep saying it doesn't work right, which
is the classic definition of "broken, needs fix".
> and so it cannot be
> fixed. It's the way the hardware works and usbnet
> is not > ready for it.
And when we went over this before, I said how
to resolve this: a *BACKWARD-COMPATIBLE change
that adds a new return state to rx_fixup(), used
in the cx82310 code. Why didn't you try that?
This proposed patch doesn't do it, since it punts
on backwards compatibility ... which is a HUGE issue
when we can't easily test all the permutations.
Best to not risk breaking things; and in this case
there's not even any need to take such risks.
- Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-11 21:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-04 21:52 [PATCH] usbnet: allow rx_process() to ignore packets Ondrej Zary
2010-09-04 23:24 ` David Brownell
2010-09-05 16:16 ` Ondrej Zary
2010-09-05 21:35 ` David Brownell
2010-09-07 20:02 ` Ondrej Zary
2010-09-10 21:35 ` [PATCH v2] usbnet: do not count empty skbs as errors in rx_process() Ondrej Zary
2010-09-11 19:07 ` David Brownell
2010-09-11 20:22 ` Ondrej Zary
2010-09-11 21:15 ` David Brownell [this message]
2010-09-11 21:21 ` Ondrej Zary
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=749423.9282.qm@web180313.mail.gq1.yahoo.com \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rainbow-software.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®