From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755956Ab1KQTje (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:39:34 -0500 Received: from hqemgate04.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.35]:17569 "EHLO hqemgate04.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755582Ab1KQTjd convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:39:33 -0500 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqnvupgp05.nvidia.com on Thu, 17 Nov 2011 11:39:15 -0800 From: Stephen Warren To: Peter De Schrijver , Peter De Schrijver CC: Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Randy Dunlap , Russell King , Colin Cross , Olof Johansson , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 11:39:14 -0800 Subject: RE: [PATCH 01/10] arm/tegra: initial device tree for tegra30 Thread-Topic: [PATCH 01/10] arm/tegra: initial device tree for tegra30 Thread-Index: AcylRU5C9Gy7NjsOShOBQhXE+oIx0QAGtNTA Message-ID: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF1740D74C46@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> References: <1321546766-26770-1-git-send-email-pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> <1321546766-26770-2-git-send-email-pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> In-Reply-To: <1321546766-26770-2-git-send-email-pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Peter De Schrijver wrote at Thursday, November 17, 2011 9:19 AM: > This patch adds the initial device tree for tegra30 > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/tegra.txt ... > +* harmony: tegra20 based development board > +Required root node properties: > + - compatible = "nvidia,harmony", "nvidia,tegra20"; > + > +* seaboard: tegra20 based clamshell reference design > +Required root node properties: > + - compatible = "nvidia,seaboard", "nvidia,tegra20"; Do we really want to list all the board names here? In the future, there could be tens or hundreds. I would argue that we should just document nvidia,tegra20 and nvidia,tegra30. At a later point, we should fix board-dt.c to solely look for those compatible values, although this will have to wait until the pinmux DT bindings are present. Then, the kernel won't care about the board names. -- nvpublic