From: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
To: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Jon Medhurst <tixy@yxit.co.uk>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sumit Bhattacharya <sumitb@nvidia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] arm: dma: Drop GFP_COMP for DMA memory allocations
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:10:03 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF174F08C785@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF174080512F@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com>
Stephen Warren wrote at Wednesday, November 09, 2011 11:04 AM:
> Stephen Warren wrote at Friday, November 04, 2011 3:36 PM:
> > dma_alloc_coherent wants to split pages after allocation in order to
> > reduce the memory footprint. This does not work well with GFP_COMP
> > pages, so drop this flag before allocation.
> >
> > This patch is ported from arch/avr32
> > (commit 3611553ef985ef7c5863c8a94641738addd04cff).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sumit Bhattacharya <sumitb@nvidia.com>
> > Tested-by: Varun Colbert <vcolbert@nvidia.com>
> > [swarren: s/HUGETLB_PAGE/HUGETLBFS/ in comment, minor comment cleanup]
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
>
> Russell, does this look good to go in the patch system now?
ping?
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 9 +++++++++
> > 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> > index e4e7f6c..68d64b4 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> > @@ -332,6 +332,15 @@ __dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle, gfp_t gfp,
> > struct page *page;
> > void *addr;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Following is a work-around (a.k.a. hack) to prevent pages
> > + * with __GFP_COMP being passed to split_page() which cannot
> > + * handle them. The real problem is that this flag probably
> > + * should be 0 on ARM as it is not supported on this
> > + * platform; see CONFIG_HUGETLBFS.
> > + */
> > + gfp &= ~(__GFP_COMP);
> > +
> > *handle = ~0;
> > size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
> >
> > --
> > 1.7.0.4
--
nvpublic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-23 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-04 21:35 Stephen Warren
2011-11-09 18:03 ` Stephen Warren
2011-11-23 19:10 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2011-11-23 23:39 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF174F08C785@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com \
--to=swarren@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=sumitb@nvidia.com \
--cc=tixy@yxit.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®