From: "Li Zhe" <lizhe.67@bytedance.com>
To: "Bharata B Rao" <bharata@amd.com>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
<bsegall@google.com>, <david@kernel.org>,
<dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>, <gourry@gourry.net>,
<joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>, <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
<kprateek.nayak@amd.com>, <ljs@kernel.org>, <mgorman@suse.de>,
<mingo@redhat.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>, <riel@redhat.com>,
<rostedt@goodmis.org>, <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
<vschneid@redhat.com>, <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] sched/numa: make free-space tiering promotion bypass configurable
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 14:24:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <74f3a0bf-22cc-42b7-8ced-c8c6ea9f6f93@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e2fb13e8-6d17-41ea-a9f7-397f62a85f72@amd.com>
On 10/29/26 12:16 PM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> On 28-Oct-26 9:42 AM, Li Zhe wrote:
>> Memory tiering normally promotes any recently accessed slow-tier page if
>> the target fast-tier node has enough free space. This preserves the
>> existing policy of filling available fast memory before relying on
>> hotness and rate-limit control.
>>
>> That is not always the desired policy. Some deployments may intentionally
>> keep part of a workload's memory on CXL-attached memory, for example to
>> preserve a desired DRAM/CXL capacity split or bandwidth distribution. With
>> the free-space bypass, short cold accesses and bursts of hot accesses can
>> refill the fast tier and pull the workload away from that distribution
>> whenever DRAM has free space.
> Currently promotion happens on 1st access. Won't it be more natural to tweak
> this frequency of access and also the time between successive accesses to
> prevent promotion due to short cold accesses and bursts of hot accesses
> rather than free space bypass configuration?
I agree that using hotness and rate-limit controls is the more natural
policy here. That is exactly what this knob is trying to make possible.
The current free-space bypass promotes before reaching those existing
checks. So when the target fast-tier node has enough free space, short
accesses can still be promoted even if they would not pass the
hotness/rate-limit path.
With this knob disabled, the free-space shortcut is skipped and those
faults fall back to the existing hotness and rate-limit controls instead.
So the patch does not add a new hotness policy; it only makes the
existing one effective even when the fast tier has free space.
Thanks,
Zhe
>
> Regards,
> Bharata.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-29 6:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-28 4:12 [PATCH v2 0/3] sched/numa: refine memory tiering promotion heuristics Li Zhe
2026-10-28 4:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] sched/numa: make free-space tiering promotion bypass configurable Li Zhe
2026-10-29 4:16 ` Bharata B Rao
2026-10-29 6:24 ` Li Zhe [this message]
2026-10-28 4:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] sched/numa: do not feed tiering promotions into task placement stats Li Zhe
2026-10-28 15:03 ` Joshua Hahn
2026-10-29 2:52 ` Li Zhe
2026-10-29 5:51 ` Bharata B Rao
2026-10-29 6:29 ` Li Zhe
2026-10-28 4:12 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] sched/numa: fix scan-period adjustment for tiering-only mode Li Zhe
2026-10-29 6:21 ` Bharata B Rao
2026-10-29 8:16 ` Li Zhe
2026-10-28 9:20 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] sched/numa: refine memory tiering promotion heuristics Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-29 2:49 ` Li Zhe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=74f3a0bf-22cc-42b7-8ced-c8c6ea9f6f93@bytedance.com \
--to=lizhe.67@bytedance.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bharata@amd.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®