mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: leds: Add support for "link" trigger
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 11:36:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <74fd5477-9165-3372-f386-3f46948b79d6@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <65b5c84f-1222-bbc3-24f5-723e07bbb6ed@maciej.szmigiero.name>

On 10/28/2017 08:27 AM, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> Currently, we create a LED trigger for any link speed known to a PHY.
> These triggers only fire when their exact link speed had been negotiated
> (they aren't cumulative, that is, they don't fire for "their or any higher"
> link speed).
> 
> What we are missing, however, is a trigger which will fire on any link
> speed known to the PHY. Such trigger can then be used for implementing a
> poor man's substitute of the "link" LED on boards that lack it.
> Let's add it.

The use case definitively makes sense, but the implementation a little less.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>
> ---
>  drivers/net/phy/Kconfig            |  7 +++++--
>  drivers/net/phy/phy_led_triggers.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig b/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
> index cd931cf9dcc2..3bcc2107ad77 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
> @@ -191,11 +191,14 @@ config LED_TRIGGER_PHY
>  	  Adds support for a set of LED trigger events per-PHY.  Link
>  	  state change will trigger the events, for consumption by an
>  	  LED class driver.  There are triggers for each link speed currently
> -	  supported by the phy, and are of the form:
> +	  supported by the PHY and also a one common "link" trigger as a
> +	  logical-or of all the link speed ones.
> +	  All these triggers are named according to the following pattern:
>  	      <mii bus id>:<phy>:<speed>
>  
>  	  Where speed is in the form:
> -		<Speed in megabits>Mbps or <Speed in gigabits>Gbps
> +		<Speed in megabits>Mbps OR <Speed in gigabits>Gbps OR link
> +		for any speed known to the PHY.
>  
>  
>  comment "MII PHY device drivers"
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_led_triggers.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_led_triggers.c
> index 94ca42e630bb..5b6f1876f514 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_led_triggers.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_led_triggers.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,8 @@ static struct phy_led_trigger *phy_speed_to_led_trigger(struct phy_device *phy,
>  {
>  	unsigned int i;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < phy->phy_num_led_triggers; i++) {
> +	/* the first (i = 0) trigger is for "any" speed */
> +	for (i = 1; i < phy->phy_num_led_triggers; i++) {
>  		if (phy->phy_led_triggers[i].speed == speed)
>  			return &phy->phy_led_triggers[i];

This looks unnecessary, because existing LED triggers are all relative
to a particular speed, you need to coerce the existing code into
accepting SPEED_UNKNOWN as a hint to mean "link". Just implement "link"
as a different trigger that does not need the speed argument/lookup to
be happening and don't change how the indexing into the array of speed
triggers is done. Just have a separate "link" trigger that is stored
separately from that existing array.

Also, what happens if I set both "link" and a given "speed" and my RJ-45
connector only has two LEDs, and one of them is already used for "activity"?
-- 
Florian

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-30 18:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-28 15:27 Maciej S. Szmigiero
2017-10-30 18:36 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2017-10-30 18:46   ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2017-10-30 18:56     ` Florian Fainelli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=74fd5477-9165-3372-f386-3f46948b79d6@gmail.com \
    --to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®