mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>
To: leo.yan@linaro.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	mike.leach@linaro.org,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@linaro.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [v3 2/5] coresight: refactor with function of_coresight_get_cpu
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 15:28:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <75112177-e5c1-0532-04b1-842a985b077d@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1489057304-1851-1-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>

On 09/03/17 11:01, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 03/03/17 06:00, Leo Yan wrote:
>> This is refactor to add function of_coresight_get_cpu(), so it's used to
>> retrieve CPU id for coresight component. Finally can use it as a common
>> function for multiple places.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>  include/linux/coresight.h                  |  2 ++
>>  2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
>> index 629e031..d9a12fb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
>> @@ -101,14 +101,36 @@ static int of_coresight_alloc_memory(struct device *dev,
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>
>> +int of_coresight_get_cpu(struct device_node *node)
>> +{
>> +	int cpu;
>> +	struct device_node *dn;
>> +
>> +	dn = of_parse_phandle(node, "cpu", 0);
>> +
>> +	/* Affinity defaults to CPU0 */
>> +	if (!dn)
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>> +		if (dn == of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL)) {
>
> We should do of_node_put() on the node returned by of_get_cpu_node,
> and I accept that this was there before the refactoring. We could do
> something like :
>
>
> ----8>------
>
>
>
> [PATCH] coresight: of_coresight_get_cpu: Add missing of_node_put
>
> The of_coresight_get_cpu iterates over the possible CPU nodes
> to find a given cpu phandle. However it does not drop the reference
> to the node pointer returned by the of_get_cpu_node.
>
> Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c | 16 +++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
> index d9a12fb..8c6f4a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
> @@ -104,7 +104,8 @@ static int of_coresight_alloc_memory(struct device *dev,
>  int of_coresight_get_cpu(struct device_node *node)
>  {
>  	int cpu;
> -	struct device_node *dn;
> +	bool found;
> +	struct device_node *dn, *np;
>
>  	dn = of_parse_phandle(node, "cpu", 0);
>
> @@ -113,15 +114,16 @@ int of_coresight_get_cpu(struct device_node *node)
>  		return 0;
>
>  	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> -		if (dn == of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL)) {
> -			of_node_put(dn);
> -			return cpu;
> -		}
> +		np = of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL);
> +		found = (dn == np);
> +		of_node_put(np);
> +		if (found)
> +			break;
>  	}
>
> -	/* Affinity to CPU0 if no cpu nodes are found */
>  	of_node_put(dn);
> -	return 0;
> +	/* Affinity to CPU0 if no cpu nodes are found */
> +	return cpu_possible(cpu) ? cpu : 0;

This could be even :
	return found ? cpu : 0;

Suzuki

      reply	other threads:[~2017-03-09 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-09 11:01 Suzuki K Poulose
2017-03-09 15:28 ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=75112177-e5c1-0532-04b1-842a985b077d@arm.com \
    --to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=guodong.xu@linaro.org \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=xuwei5@hisilicon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®