From: Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>
To: leo.yan@linaro.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
mark.rutland@arm.com, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
mike.leach@linaro.org,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@linaro.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [v3 2/5] coresight: refactor with function of_coresight_get_cpu
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 15:28:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <75112177-e5c1-0532-04b1-842a985b077d@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1489057304-1851-1-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
On 09/03/17 11:01, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 03/03/17 06:00, Leo Yan wrote:
>> This is refactor to add function of_coresight_get_cpu(), so it's used to
>> retrieve CPU id for coresight component. Finally can use it as a common
>> function for multiple places.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
>> include/linux/coresight.h | 2 ++
>> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
>> index 629e031..d9a12fb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
>> @@ -101,14 +101,36 @@ static int of_coresight_alloc_memory(struct device *dev,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +int of_coresight_get_cpu(struct device_node *node)
>> +{
>> + int cpu;
>> + struct device_node *dn;
>> +
>> + dn = of_parse_phandle(node, "cpu", 0);
>> +
>> + /* Affinity defaults to CPU0 */
>> + if (!dn)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>> + if (dn == of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL)) {
>
> We should do of_node_put() on the node returned by of_get_cpu_node,
> and I accept that this was there before the refactoring. We could do
> something like :
>
>
> ----8>------
>
>
>
> [PATCH] coresight: of_coresight_get_cpu: Add missing of_node_put
>
> The of_coresight_get_cpu iterates over the possible CPU nodes
> to find a given cpu phandle. However it does not drop the reference
> to the node pointer returned by the of_get_cpu_node.
>
> Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c | 16 +++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
> index d9a12fb..8c6f4a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
> @@ -104,7 +104,8 @@ static int of_coresight_alloc_memory(struct device *dev,
> int of_coresight_get_cpu(struct device_node *node)
> {
> int cpu;
> - struct device_node *dn;
> + bool found;
> + struct device_node *dn, *np;
>
> dn = of_parse_phandle(node, "cpu", 0);
>
> @@ -113,15 +114,16 @@ int of_coresight_get_cpu(struct device_node *node)
> return 0;
>
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> - if (dn == of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL)) {
> - of_node_put(dn);
> - return cpu;
> - }
> + np = of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL);
> + found = (dn == np);
> + of_node_put(np);
> + if (found)
> + break;
> }
>
> - /* Affinity to CPU0 if no cpu nodes are found */
> of_node_put(dn);
> - return 0;
> + /* Affinity to CPU0 if no cpu nodes are found */
> + return cpu_possible(cpu) ? cpu : 0;
This could be even :
return found ? cpu : 0;
Suzuki
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-09 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-09 11:01 Suzuki K Poulose
2017-03-09 15:28 ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=75112177-e5c1-0532-04b1-842a985b077d@arm.com \
--to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guodong.xu@linaro.org \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=xuwei5@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®