mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, cpandya@codeaurora.org
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] of: cache phandle nodes to reduce cost of of_find_node_by_phandle()
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 17:00:44 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <75515998-10e0-5025-7828-649112231067@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6e967dd4-0fae-a912-88cd-b60f40ec0727@gmail.com>

Hi Rob,

On 02/11/18 22:56, Frank Rowand wrote:
> Hi Rob,
> 
> On 02/11/18 22:27, frowand.list@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
>>
>> Create a cache of the nodes that contain a phandle property.  Use this
>> cache to find the node for a given phandle value instead of scanning
>> the devicetree to find the node.  If the phandle value is not found
>> in the cache, of_find_node_by_phandle() will fall back to the tree
>> scan algorithm.
>>
>> The cache is initialized in of_core_init().
>>
>> The cache is freed via a late_initcall_sync() if modules are not
>> enabled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>>   - change short description from
>>     of: cache phandle nodes to reduce cost of of_find_node_by_phandle()
>>   - rebase on v4.16-rc1
>>   - reorder new functions in base.c to avoid forward declaration
>>   - add locking around kfree(phandle_cache) for memory ordering
>>   - add explicit check for non-null of phandle_cache in
>>     of_find_node_by_phandle().  There is already a check for !handle,
>>     which prevents accessing a null phandle_cache, but that dependency
>>     is not obvious, so this check makes it more apparent.
>>   - do not free phandle_cache if modules are enabled, so that
>>     cached phandles will be available when modules are loaded
> 
> < snip >
> 
> 
> 
> In a previous thread, you said:
> 
>> We should be able to do this earlier. We already walk the tree twice
>> in unflattening. We can get the max phandle (or number of phandles
>> IMO) on the first pass, allocate with the early allocator and then
>> populate the cache in the 2nd pass. AIUI, you can alloc with memblock
>> and then free with kfree as the memblock allocations get transferred
>> to the slab.
> 
> And I replied:
> 
>    Thanks for pointing out that kfree() can be used for memory alloced
>    with memblock.  I'll change to populate the cache earlier.
> 
> 
> I started to make this change when I moved forward to v4.16-rc1.  There
> are two obvious ways to do this.

< snip >

And I did not finish the explanation, sorry.  I meant to finish with saying
that given the drawbacks that I ended up not making the change for v2.

While modifying the patch to respond to the v2 comments, I decided to go
ahead and try using memblock to alloc memory earlier.  The result I got
was that when I tried to kfree() the memory at late_initcall_sync I got
a panic.  The alloc function I used is memblock_virt_alloc().  You mention
"slab" specifically.  Maybe the problem is that my system is using "slub"
instead.  Dunno...

-Frank

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-14  1:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-12  6:27 frowand.list
2018-02-12  6:56 ` Frank Rowand
2018-02-14  1:00   ` Frank Rowand [this message]
2018-02-14 15:50     ` Rob Herring
2018-02-12  6:58 ` Frank Rowand
2018-02-12  8:58 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2018-02-12 20:06   ` Frank Rowand
2018-02-12 10:51 ` Chintan Pandya
2018-02-12 20:33   ` Frank Rowand
2018-02-13 14:49 ` Rob Herring
2018-02-14  1:07   ` Frank Rowand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=75515998-10e0-5025-7828-649112231067@gmail.com \
    --to=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=cpandya@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®