From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, cpandya@codeaurora.org
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] of: cache phandle nodes to reduce cost of of_find_node_by_phandle()
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 17:00:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <75515998-10e0-5025-7828-649112231067@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6e967dd4-0fae-a912-88cd-b60f40ec0727@gmail.com>
Hi Rob,
On 02/11/18 22:56, Frank Rowand wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 02/11/18 22:27, frowand.list@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
>>
>> Create a cache of the nodes that contain a phandle property. Use this
>> cache to find the node for a given phandle value instead of scanning
>> the devicetree to find the node. If the phandle value is not found
>> in the cache, of_find_node_by_phandle() will fall back to the tree
>> scan algorithm.
>>
>> The cache is initialized in of_core_init().
>>
>> The cache is freed via a late_initcall_sync() if modules are not
>> enabled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> - change short description from
>> of: cache phandle nodes to reduce cost of of_find_node_by_phandle()
>> - rebase on v4.16-rc1
>> - reorder new functions in base.c to avoid forward declaration
>> - add locking around kfree(phandle_cache) for memory ordering
>> - add explicit check for non-null of phandle_cache in
>> of_find_node_by_phandle(). There is already a check for !handle,
>> which prevents accessing a null phandle_cache, but that dependency
>> is not obvious, so this check makes it more apparent.
>> - do not free phandle_cache if modules are enabled, so that
>> cached phandles will be available when modules are loaded
>
> < snip >
>
>
>
> In a previous thread, you said:
>
>> We should be able to do this earlier. We already walk the tree twice
>> in unflattening. We can get the max phandle (or number of phandles
>> IMO) on the first pass, allocate with the early allocator and then
>> populate the cache in the 2nd pass. AIUI, you can alloc with memblock
>> and then free with kfree as the memblock allocations get transferred
>> to the slab.
>
> And I replied:
>
> Thanks for pointing out that kfree() can be used for memory alloced
> with memblock. I'll change to populate the cache earlier.
>
>
> I started to make this change when I moved forward to v4.16-rc1. There
> are two obvious ways to do this.
< snip >
And I did not finish the explanation, sorry. I meant to finish with saying
that given the drawbacks that I ended up not making the change for v2.
While modifying the patch to respond to the v2 comments, I decided to go
ahead and try using memblock to alloc memory earlier. The result I got
was that when I tried to kfree() the memory at late_initcall_sync I got
a panic. The alloc function I used is memblock_virt_alloc(). You mention
"slab" specifically. Maybe the problem is that my system is using "slub"
instead. Dunno...
-Frank
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-14 1:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-12 6:27 frowand.list
2018-02-12 6:56 ` Frank Rowand
2018-02-14 1:00 ` Frank Rowand [this message]
2018-02-14 15:50 ` Rob Herring
2018-02-12 6:58 ` Frank Rowand
2018-02-12 8:58 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2018-02-12 20:06 ` Frank Rowand
2018-02-12 10:51 ` Chintan Pandya
2018-02-12 20:33 ` Frank Rowand
2018-02-13 14:49 ` Rob Herring
2018-02-14 1:07 ` Frank Rowand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=75515998-10e0-5025-7828-649112231067@gmail.com \
--to=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=cpandya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®