From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>, markgross@kernel.org
Cc: Mario.Limonciello@amd.com, prasanth.ksr@dell.com,
jorgealtxwork@gmail.com, james@equiv.tech,
Dell.Client.Kernel@dell.com, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86: wmi: Allow retrieving the number of WMI object instances
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2023 22:41:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <756215f5-d99c-b172-13f6-1a15e026bf65@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230430203153.5587-2-W_Armin@gmx.de>
Hi Armin,
On 4/30/23 22:31, Armin Wolf wrote:
> Currently, the WMI driver core knows how many instances of a given
> WMI object exist, but WMI drivers cannot access this information.
> At the same time, some current and upcoming WMI drivers want to
> have access to this information. Add wmi_instance_count() and
> wmidev_instance_count() to allow WMI drivers to get the number of
> WMI object instances.
>
> Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
Thank you for your work on this.
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/acpi.h | 2 ++
> include/linux/wmi.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
> index c226dd4163a1..5b95d7aa5c2f 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
> @@ -263,6 +263,47 @@ int set_required_buffer_size(struct wmi_device *wdev, u64 length)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(set_required_buffer_size);
>
> +/**
> + * wmi_instance_count - Get number of WMI object instances
> + * @guid_string: 36 char string of the form fa50ff2b-f2e8-45de-83fa-65417f2f49ba
> + *
> + * Get the number of WMI object instances.
> + *
> + * Returns: Number of WMI object instances or negative error code.
> + */
> +int wmi_instance_count(const char *guid_string)
> +{
> + struct wmi_block *wblock;
> + acpi_status status;
> +
> + status = find_guid(guid_string, &wblock);
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> + if (status == AE_BAD_PARAMETER)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return -ENODEV;
Maybe just return 0 here ?
The GUID not existing at all does not seem like
an error to me, but rather a case of there
being 0 instances.
This will also allow patch 2/2 to completely
drop the get_instance_count() function and
replace its callers with direct calls to
wmi_instance_count() as the code is known
to always pass a valid GUID, so it won't hit
the -EINVAL path.
Regards,
Hans
> + }
> +
> + return wmidev_instance_count(&wblock->dev);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wmi_instance_count);
> +
> +/**
> + * wmidev_instance_count - Get number of WMI object instances
> + * @wdev: A wmi bus device from a driver
> + *
> + * Get the number of WMI object instances.
> + *
> + * Returns: Number of WMI object instances.
> + */
> +u8 wmidev_instance_count(struct wmi_device *wdev)
> +{
> + struct wmi_block *wblock = container_of(wdev, struct wmi_block, dev);
> +
> + return wblock->gblock.instance_count;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wmidev_instance_count);
> +
> /**
> * wmi_evaluate_method - Evaluate a WMI method (deprecated)
> * @guid_string: 36 char string of the form fa50ff2b-f2e8-45de-83fa-65417f2f49ba
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index efff750f326d..e52bf2742eaf 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -412,6 +412,8 @@ extern bool acpi_is_pnp_device(struct acpi_device *);
>
> typedef void (*wmi_notify_handler) (u32 value, void *context);
>
> +int wmi_instance_count(const char *guid);
> +
> extern acpi_status wmi_evaluate_method(const char *guid, u8 instance,
> u32 method_id,
> const struct acpi_buffer *in,
> diff --git a/include/linux/wmi.h b/include/linux/wmi.h
> index c1a3bd4e4838..763bd382cf2d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/wmi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/wmi.h
> @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ extern acpi_status wmidev_evaluate_method(struct wmi_device *wdev,
> extern union acpi_object *wmidev_block_query(struct wmi_device *wdev,
> u8 instance);
>
> +u8 wmidev_instance_count(struct wmi_device *wdev);
> +
> extern int set_required_buffer_size(struct wmi_device *wdev, u64 length);
>
> /**
> --
> 2.30.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-30 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-30 20:31 [PATCH 0/2] platform/x86: " Armin Wolf
2023-04-30 20:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86: wmi: " Armin Wolf
2023-04-30 20:41 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2023-04-30 21:01 ` Armin Wolf
2023-05-01 9:31 ` Hans de Goede
2023-04-30 20:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] platform/x86: dell-sysman: Improve instance detection Armin Wolf
2023-05-09 10:10 ` [PATCH 0/2] platform/x86: Allow retrieving the number of WMI object instances Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=756215f5-d99c-b172-13f6-1a15e026bf65@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=Dell.Client.Kernel@dell.com \
--cc=Mario.Limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=W_Armin@gmx.de \
--cc=james@equiv.tech \
--cc=jorgealtxwork@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markgross@kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prasanth.ksr@dell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®