From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from shelob.surriel.com (shelob.surriel.com [96.67.55.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BED14AA41E; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 18:15:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=96.67.55.147 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790273722; cv=none; b=N76zGZtLsWXQ5lSTf5Bu46+EsctSPLXJ+VLcfzS9fIv/jii1eO0Jyrn6qCTdW+gQ2Wpui7epmOYMxKzj3nyvY44SI7klA//r9rNXrJSRo0Sn12F5Way8sXweKQ/UI35Ny75HncDvF/D5rQJ6fcBEnjmkzMlUmWp1mCyN91Vhkcs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790273722; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wX8CSj2fNMWwCN/CUlUpxrxanIa2BZUzno2ME71/0zE=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=pkAE8VOeBdkdMnvsOZADj8WCHh2jcfvH0UWKGqioTIJ2KZi4neyWgF87uxhBlB6jVeu+iugemUwNUSxXbpaWlycInk4+YI0QeE/ZYR1162GVItQU/cZ/t9ubVmIhkECc7OIgBYle8dCx2Hqi/Cqi5/vY8DI5FBvLPjY/YcEbfPY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=surriel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=surriel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=surriel.com header.i=@surriel.com header.b=OAIh3WtG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=96.67.55.147 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=surriel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=surriel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=surriel.com header.i=@surriel.com header.b="OAIh3WtG" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=surriel.com ; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:References: In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID; bh=wX8CSj2fNMWwCN/CUlUpxrxanIa2BZUzno2ME71/0zE=; b=OAIh3W tGD3YH8owDqUp8FviZpRcyXxHQqpTPleog+faXwIQZh19fWn0SW/U5aEYDzlYglaflJbiiF6t1k4m bo+fCQ0U0Q2u0m+jicUUH42aRuCUD15VoZfupmNR9d8u1FdUiLCnRKlFLcun1d6znBHhkFXN2lBhP TiBv7p9NChjggdQrsD/M/jrX1xnYse8KbIMqauuw+rhFMSAcHD5KnyOlz6L3YYHQNaRLX4pj59uHO GRAYtKLvk5mtHCh9uydQQD53zlJ+Vuqv4n7i8XdEEFAfd0maQ1ogkh90OFcOznMeq0pxq5ksBHe7G a4XmqjJKjRthdWfxgUF722GpMqHg==; Received: from [2601:18c:8100:a0e0:5a47:caff:fe78:8708] by shelob.surriel.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.99.5) (envelope-from ) id 1x9nvx-00000004TfP-3vhu; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 18:12:37 +0000 Message-ID: <7571f005bca65aa4ad5e7ec89e62801ad058b689.camel@surriel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/11] mm, swap: add virtual swap device infrastructure From: Rik van Riel To: Chris Li , Nhat Pham Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, kasong@tencent.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, shakeel.butt@linux.dev, yosry@kernel.org, david@kernel.org, muchun.song@linux.dev, shikemeng@huaweicloud.com, baoquan.he@linux.dev, baohua@kernel.org, youngjun.park@lge.com, chengming.zhou@linux.dev, ljs@kernel.org, liam@infradead.org, vbabka@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com, qi.zheng@linux.dev, axelrasmussen@google.com, yuanchu@google.com, weixugc@google.com, gourry@gourry.net, haowenchao22@gmail.com, corbet@lwn.net, hughd@google.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, tj@kernel.org, mkoutny@suse.com, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, kunwu.chan@linux.dev, kernel-team@meta.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 14:12:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: References: <20260918180241.3424851-1-nphamcs@gmail.com> <20260918180241.3424851-2-nphamcs@gmail.com> Autocrypt: addr=riel@surriel.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata=mQENBFIt3aUBCADCK0LicyCYyMa0E1lodCDUBf6G+6C5UXKG1jEYwQu49cc/gUBTTk33A eo2hjn4JinVaPF3zfZprnKMEGGv4dHvEOCPWiNhlz5RtqH3SKJllq2dpeMS9RqbMvDA36rlJIIo47 Z/nl6IA8MDhSqyqdnTY8z7LnQHqq16jAqwo7Ll9qALXz4yG1ZdSCmo80VPetBZZPw7WMjo+1hByv/ lvdFnLfiQ52tayuuC1r9x2qZ/SYWd2M4p/f5CLmvG9UcnkbYFsKWz8bwOBWKg1PQcaYHLx06sHGdY dIDaeVvkIfMFwAprSo5EFU+aes2VB2ZjugOTbkkW2aPSWTRsBhPHhV6dABEBAAG0HlJpayB2YW4gU mllbCA8cmllbEByZWRoYXQuY29tPokBHwQwAQIACQUCW5LcVgIdIAAKCRDOed6ShMTeg05SB/986o gEgdq4byrtaBQKFg5LWfd8e+h+QzLOg/T8mSS3dJzFXe5JBOfvYg7Bj47xXi9I5sM+I9Lu9+1XVb/ r2rGJrU1DwA09TnmyFtK76bgMF0sBEh1ECILYNQTEIemzNFwOWLZZlEhZFRJsZyX+mtEp/WQIygHV WjwuP69VJw+fPQvLOGn4j8W9QXuvhha7u1QJ7mYx4dLGHrZlHdwDsqpvWsW+3rsIqs1BBe5/Itz9o 6y9gLNtQzwmSDioV8KhF85VmYInslhv5tUtMEppfdTLyX4SUKh8ftNIVmH9mXyRCZclSoa6IMd635 Jq1Pj2/Lp64tOzSvN5Y9zaiCc5FucXtB9SaWsgdmFuIFJpZWwgPHJpZWxAc3VycmllbC5jb20+iQE +BBMBAgAoBQJSLd2lAhsjBQkSzAMABgsJCAcDAgYVCAIJCgsEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRDOed6ShMTe g4PpB/0ZivKYFt0LaB22ssWUrBoeNWCP1NY/lkq2QbPhR3agLB7ZXI97PF2z/5QD9Fuy/FD/jddPx KRTvFCtHcEzTOcFjBmf52uqgt3U40H9GM++0IM0yHusd9EzlaWsbp09vsAV2DwdqS69x9RPbvE/Ne fO5subhocH76okcF/aQiQ+oj2j6LJZGBJBVigOHg+4zyzdDgKM+jp0bvDI51KQ4XfxV593OhvkS3z 3FPx0CE7l62WhWrieHyBblqvkTYgJ6dq4bsYpqxxGJOkQ47WpEUx6onH+rImWmPJbSYGhwBzTo0Mm G1Nb1qGPG+mTrSmJjDRxrwf1zjmYqQreWVSFEt26tBpSaWsgdmFuIFJpZWwgPHJpZWxAZmIuY29tP okBPgQTAQIAKAUCW5LbiAIbIwUJEswDAAYLCQgHAwIGFQgCCQoLBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQznneko TE3oOUEQgAsrGxjTC1bGtZyuvyQPcXclap11Ogib6rQywGYu6/Mnkbd6hbyY3wpdyQii/cas2S44N cQj8HkGv91JLVE24/Wt0gITPCH3rLVJJDGQxprHTVDs1t1RAbsbp0XTksZPCNWDGYIBo2aHDwErhI omYQ0Xluo1WBtH/UmHgirHvclsou1Ks9jyTxiPyUKRfae7GNOFiX99+ZlB27P3t8CjtSO831Ij0Ip QrfooZ21YVlUKw0Wy6Ll8EyefyrEYSh8KTm8dQj4O7xxvdg865TLeLpho5PwDRF+/mR3qi8CdGbkE c4pYZQO8UDXUN4S+pe0aTeTqlYw8rRHWF9TnvtpcNzZw== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.60.2 (3.60.2-1.fc44) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 On Tue, 2026-09-22 at 23:18 -1000, Chris Li wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 1:03=E2=80=AFPM Nhat Pham wro= te: > >=20 > >=20 > > @@ -482,6 +491,11 @@ void swap_read_folio(struct swap_io_ctx *ctx, > > struct folio *folio) > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 if (zswap_load(folio) !=3D -= ENOENT) > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 goto finish; > >=20 > > +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 if (unlikely(swap_is_vswap(sis)))= { >=20 > There are too many swap_is_vswap() in this series. It fragments the > code path, making things harder to reason about. Esepcially around > locks. I count 22 in this patch alone. >=20 > I consider this the biggest drawback of this series. This > fragmentation of the code path. Could we avoid that by simply always having everything go through the vswap abstraction layer? When everything in vswap, we don't need to test for it. Handling the details of what's behind the vswap would be handled one layer down. Chris, do you think that would be cleaner? What am I missing? --=20 All Rights Reversed.