From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: AVIC related warning in enable_irq_window
Date: Sat, 2 May 2020 18:42:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <758b27a8-74c0-087d-d90b-d95faee2f561@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9ce7bb5c4fb8bcc4ac21103f7534a6edfcbe195d.camel@redhat.com>
On 02/05/20 15:58, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> The AVIC is disabled by svm_toggle_avic_for_irq_window, which calls
> kvm_request_apicv_update, which broadcasts the KVM_REQ_APICV_UPDATE vcpu request,
> however it doesn't broadcast it to CPU on which now we are running, which seems OK,
> because the code that handles that broadcast runs on each VCPU entry, thus
> when this CPU will enter guest mode it will notice and disable the AVIC.
>
> However later in svm_enable_vintr, there is test 'WARN_ON(kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(&svm->vcpu));'
> which is still true on current CPU because of the above.
Good point! We can just remove the WARN_ON I think. Can you send a patch?
svm_set_vintr also has a rather silly
static void svm_set_vintr(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
{
set_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_VINTR);
if (is_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_VINTR))
svm_enable_vintr(svm);
}
so I'm thinking of just inlining svm_enable_vintr and renaming
svm_{set,clear}_vintr to svm_{enable,disable}_vintr_window. Would you
like to send two patches for this, the first to remove the WARN_ON and
the second to do the cleanup?
Thanks,
Paolo
> The code containing this warning was added in commit
>
> 64b5bd27042639dfcc1534f01771b7b871a02ffe
> KVM: nSVM: ignore L1 interrupt window while running L2 with V_INTR_MASKING=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-02 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-02 13:58 Maxim Levitsky
2020-05-02 16:42 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2020-05-02 16:43 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-05-03 19:18 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2020-05-04 8:46 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2020-05-04 9:13 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-05-04 9:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-04 10:37 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2020-05-04 10:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-05 7:55 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2020-05-05 11:40 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-05-05 12:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-06 0:42 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=758b27a8-74c0-087d-d90b-d95faee2f561@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®