From: Aditya Garg <gargaditya08@live.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@de.bosch.com>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] Revert "drivers: core: synchronize really_probe() and dev_uevent()"
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 06:16:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <75F8FAD9-964A-4F87-8D71-AEF166D9E10D@live.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250311052417.1846985-1-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
> On 11 Mar 2025, at 10:54 AM, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This reverts commit c0a40097f0bc81deafc15f9195d1fb54595cd6d0.
>
> Probing a device can take arbitrary long time. In the field we observed
> that, for example, probing a bad micro-SD cards in an external USB card
> reader (or maybe cards were good but cables were flaky) sometimes takes
> longer than 2 minutes due to multiple retries at various levels of the
> stack. We can not block uevent_show() method for that long because udev
> is reading that attribute very often and that blocks udev and interferes
> with booting of the system.
>
> The change that introduced locking was concerned with dev_uevent()
> racing with unbinding the driver. However we can handle it without
> locking (which will be done in subsequent patch).
>
> There was also claim that synchronization with probe() is needed to
> properly load USB drivers, however this is a red herring: the change
> adding the lock was introduced in May of last year and USB loading and
> probing worked properly for many years before that.
>
> Revert the harmful locking.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
> ---
Hi
For sometime users of the appletbdrm driver used for Touch Bar support on T2 Macs (https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/appletbdrm.c?h=v7.0-rc4) have been facing a regression that caused the Touch Bar to no longer work on resume. A person tried to bisect and this commit was found to be the reason.
The person has tried to explain the whole situation in this GitHub issue: https://github.com/t2linux/wiki/issues/635#issuecomment-4092907335
And this seems to be the most plausible explanation: https://github.com/t2linux/wiki/issues/635#issuecomment-4071720148
Thanks
Aditya
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-20 6:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-11 5:24 Dmitry Torokhov
2025-03-11 5:24 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] driver core: introduce device_set_driver() helper Dmitry Torokhov
2025-04-03 22:17 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-03-11 5:24 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] driver core: fix potential NULL pointer dereference in dev_uevent() Dmitry Torokhov
2025-04-03 22:20 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-04-03 4:08 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] Revert "drivers: core: synchronize really_probe() and dev_uevent()" Masami Hiramatsu
2026-03-20 6:16 ` Aditya Garg [this message]
2026-03-20 7:24 ` Dmitry Torokhov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=75F8FAD9-964A-4F87-8D71-AEF166D9E10D@live.com \
--to=gargaditya08@live.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dirk.behme@de.bosch.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®