From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
oleg@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390: add support for TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 07:09:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <75a238c7-fc37-21dd-bd89-d4c87a206eaa@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yt9do8ke4seh.fsf@linux.ibm.com>
On 11/3/20 4:00 AM, Sven Schnelle wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> Heiko Carstens <hca () linux ! ibm ! com> writes:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 10:21:11AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> Wire up TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL handling for s390.
>>>
>>> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> 5.11 has support queued up for TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL, see this posting
>>> for details:
>>>
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/20201026203230.386348-1-axboe@kernel.dk/
>>>
>>> As part of that work, I'm adding TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL support to all archs,
>>> as that will enable a set of cleanups once all of them support it. I'm
>>> happy carrying this patch if need be, or it can be funelled through the
>>> arch tree. Let me know.
>>>
>>> arch/s390/include/asm/thread_info.h | 2 ++
>>> arch/s390/kernel/entry.S | 7 ++++++-
>>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/thread_info.h
>>> index 13a04fcf7762..0045341ade48 100644
>>> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/thread_info.h
>>> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/thread_info.h
>>> @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ void arch_setup_new_exec(void);
>>> #define TIF_GUARDED_STORAGE 4 /* load guarded storage control block */
>>> #define TIF_PATCH_PENDING 5 /* pending live patching update */
>>> #define TIF_PGSTE 6 /* New mm's will use 4K page tables */
>>> +#define TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL 7 /* signal notifications exist */
>>> #define TIF_ISOLATE_BP 8 /* Run process with isolated BP */
>>> #define TIF_ISOLATE_BP_GUEST 9 /* Run KVM guests with isolated BP */
>>>
>>> @@ -82,6 +83,7 @@ void arch_setup_new_exec(void);
>>> #define TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT 27 /* syscall tracepoint instrumentation */
>>>
>>> #define _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME BIT(TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME)
>>> +#define _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL BIT(TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL)
>>> #define _TIF_SIGPENDING BIT(TIF_SIGPENDING)
>>> #define _TIF_NEED_RESCHED BIT(TIF_NEED_RESCHED)
>>> #define _TIF_UPROBE BIT(TIF_UPROBE)
>>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S b/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S
>>> index 86235919c2d1..a30d891e8045 100644
>>> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S
>>> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S
>>> @@ -52,7 +52,8 @@ STACK_SIZE = 1 << STACK_SHIFT
>>> STACK_INIT = STACK_SIZE - STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD - __PT_SIZE
>>>
>>> _TIF_WORK = (_TIF_SIGPENDING | _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME | _TIF_NEED_RESCHED | \
>>> - _TIF_UPROBE | _TIF_GUARDED_STORAGE | _TIF_PATCH_PENDING)
>>> + _TIF_UPROBE | _TIF_GUARDED_STORAGE | _TIF_PATCH_PENDING | \
>>> + _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL)
>>> _TIF_TRACE = (_TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE | _TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT | _TIF_SECCOMP | \
>>> _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT)
>>> _CIF_WORK = (_CIF_ASCE_PRIMARY | _CIF_ASCE_SECONDARY | _CIF_FPU)
>>> @@ -463,6 +464,8 @@ ENTRY(system_call)
>>> #endif
>>> TSTMSK __PT_FLAGS(%r11),_PIF_SYSCALL_RESTART
>>> jo .Lsysc_syscall_restart
>>> + TSTMSK __TI_flags(%r12),_TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL
>>> + jo .Lsysc_sigpending
>>> TSTMSK __TI_flags(%r12),_TIF_SIGPENDING
>>> jo .Lsysc_sigpending
>>> TSTMSK __TI_flags(%r12),_TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME
>>> @@ -857,6 +860,8 @@ ENTRY(io_int_handler)
>>> #endif
>>> TSTMSK __TI_flags(%r12),_TIF_SIGPENDING
>>> jo .Lio_sigpending
>>> + TSTMSK __TI_flags(%r12),_TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL
>>> + jo .Lio_sigpending
>>> TSTMSK __TI_flags(%r12),_TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME
>>> jo .Lio_notify_resume
>>> TSTMSK __TI_flags(%r12),_TIF_GUARDED_STORAGE
>>
>> (full quote so you can make sense of the patch below).
>>
>> Please merge the patch below into this one. With that:
>>
>> Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S b/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S
>> index a30d891e8045..31f16d903ef3 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S
>> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S
>> @@ -464,9 +464,7 @@ ENTRY(system_call)
>> #endif
>> TSTMSK __PT_FLAGS(%r11),_PIF_SYSCALL_RESTART
>> jo .Lsysc_syscall_restart
>> - TSTMSK __TI_flags(%r12),_TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL
>> - jo .Lsysc_sigpending
>> - TSTMSK __TI_flags(%r12),_TIF_SIGPENDING
>> + TSTMSK __TI_flags(%r12),(_TIF_SIGPENDING|_TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL)
>> jo .Lsysc_sigpending
>
> We need to also change the jo to jnz - in combination with tm, jo means
> 'jump if all tested bits are set' while jnz means 'jump if at least one
> bit is set'
Ah thanks, good catch. And you also caught the braino in signal.c, here's
the end result:
commit 0eb7d372d5319970bd15f2dbc18264ea576214d4
Author: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Date: Fri Oct 9 15:34:12 2020 -0600
s390: add support for TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL
Wire up TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL handling for s390.
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/thread_info.h
index 13a04fcf7762..0045341ade48 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/thread_info.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/thread_info.h
@@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ void arch_setup_new_exec(void);
#define TIF_GUARDED_STORAGE 4 /* load guarded storage control block */
#define TIF_PATCH_PENDING 5 /* pending live patching update */
#define TIF_PGSTE 6 /* New mm's will use 4K page tables */
+#define TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL 7 /* signal notifications exist */
#define TIF_ISOLATE_BP 8 /* Run process with isolated BP */
#define TIF_ISOLATE_BP_GUEST 9 /* Run KVM guests with isolated BP */
@@ -82,6 +83,7 @@ void arch_setup_new_exec(void);
#define TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT 27 /* syscall tracepoint instrumentation */
#define _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME BIT(TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME)
+#define _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL BIT(TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL)
#define _TIF_SIGPENDING BIT(TIF_SIGPENDING)
#define _TIF_NEED_RESCHED BIT(TIF_NEED_RESCHED)
#define _TIF_UPROBE BIT(TIF_UPROBE)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S b/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S
index 86235919c2d1..19a89f292290 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S
@@ -52,7 +52,8 @@ STACK_SIZE = 1 << STACK_SHIFT
STACK_INIT = STACK_SIZE - STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD - __PT_SIZE
_TIF_WORK = (_TIF_SIGPENDING | _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME | _TIF_NEED_RESCHED | \
- _TIF_UPROBE | _TIF_GUARDED_STORAGE | _TIF_PATCH_PENDING)
+ _TIF_UPROBE | _TIF_GUARDED_STORAGE | _TIF_PATCH_PENDING | \
+ _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL)
_TIF_TRACE = (_TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE | _TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT | _TIF_SECCOMP | \
_TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT)
_CIF_WORK = (_CIF_ASCE_PRIMARY | _CIF_ASCE_SECONDARY | _CIF_FPU)
@@ -463,8 +464,8 @@ ENTRY(system_call)
#endif
TSTMSK __PT_FLAGS(%r11),_PIF_SYSCALL_RESTART
jo .Lsysc_syscall_restart
- TSTMSK __TI_flags(%r12),_TIF_SIGPENDING
- jo .Lsysc_sigpending
+ TSTMSK __TI_flags(%r12),(_TIF_SIGPENDING|_TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL)
+ jnz .Lsysc_sigpending
TSTMSK __TI_flags(%r12),_TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME
jo .Lsysc_notify_resume
TSTMSK __LC_CPU_FLAGS,(_CIF_ASCE_PRIMARY|_CIF_ASCE_SECONDARY)
@@ -855,8 +856,8 @@ ENTRY(io_int_handler)
TSTMSK __TI_flags(%r12),_TIF_PATCH_PENDING
jo .Lio_patch_pending
#endif
- TSTMSK __TI_flags(%r12),_TIF_SIGPENDING
- jo .Lio_sigpending
+ TSTMSK __TI_flags(%r12),(_TIF_SIGPENDING|_TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL)
+ jnz .Lio_sigpending
TSTMSK __TI_flags(%r12),_TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME
jo .Lio_notify_resume
TSTMSK __TI_flags(%r12),_TIF_GUARDED_STORAGE
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/signal.c b/arch/s390/kernel/signal.c
index 9e900a8977bd..b27b6c1f058d 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/signal.c
@@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ void do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs)
current->thread.system_call =
test_pt_regs_flag(regs, PIF_SYSCALL) ? regs->int_code : 0;
- if (get_signal(&ksig)) {
+ if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SIGPENDING) && get_signal(&ksig)) {
/* Whee! Actually deliver the signal. */
if (current->thread.system_call) {
regs->int_code = current->thread.system_call;
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-03 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20201101173153.GC9375@osiris>
2020-11-03 11:00 ` Sven Schnelle
2020-11-03 14:09 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2020-11-03 15:03 ` Sven Schnelle
2020-11-03 15:12 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] <54c02fa6-8c8a-667f-af99-e83a1f150586 () kernel ! dk>
2020-11-03 10:54 ` Sven Schnelle
[not found] <20201101173153.GC9375 () osiris>
2020-11-02 16:59 ` Qian Cai
2020-11-02 17:04 ` Heiko Carstens
2020-11-02 17:07 ` Jens Axboe
2020-11-02 18:58 ` Qian Cai
2020-11-02 19:50 ` Jens Axboe
2020-11-02 21:15 ` Qian Cai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=75a238c7-fc37-21dd-bd89-d4c87a206eaa@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®