From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Robert Marko <robert.marko@sartura.hr>, <ulfh@kernel.org>,
<robh@kernel.org>, <krzk+dt@kernel.org>, <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
<nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>, <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
<claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>, <aubin.constans@microchip.com>,
<ehristev@kernel.org>, <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <luka.perkov@sartura.hr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: add option to keep clocks enabled
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 13:31:13 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <75a49f8d-eced-4b47-8184-0d1a0d0f1a01@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907132617.1198548-3-robert.marko@sartura.hr>
On 07/09/2026 16:25, Robert Marko wrote:
> sdhci_at91_set_clks_presets() both enables the controller clocks and
> programs its capabilities and preset registers. This prevents callers from
> restoring the registers without changing the clock enable counts.
>
> Move clock enablement to callers and add a SoC data flag for controllers
> that must keep their clocks enabled. Use it in the runtime PM paths while
> keeping register restoration separate from clock enablement.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robert.marko@sartura.hr>
>
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c
> index 7c4ac65f247d..b7e2a89da348 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
> struct sdhci_at91_soc_data {
> const struct sdhci_pltfm_data *pdata;
> bool baseclk_is_generated_internally;
> + bool keep_clks_on;
It can be a bit easier to read when conditions do not have to be
inverted, like
if (priv->soc_data->suspend_clks)
instead of:
if (!priv->soc_data->keep_clks_on)
> unsigned int divider_for_baseclk;
> };
>
> @@ -164,7 +165,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id sdhci_at91_dt_match[] = {
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sdhci_at91_dt_match);
>
> -static int sdhci_at91_set_clks_presets(struct device *dev)
> +static void sdhci_at91_set_clks_presets(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct sdhci_host *host = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> @@ -174,7 +175,6 @@ static int sdhci_at91_set_clks_presets(struct device *dev)
> unsigned int gck_rate, clk_base_rate;
> unsigned int preset_div;
>
> - clk_prepare_enable(priv->hclock);
Might just as well pass in a parameter and:
if (prepare_clks)
clk_prepare_enable(priv->hclock);
> caps0 = readl(host->ioaddr + SDHCI_CAPABILITIES);
> caps1 = readl(host->ioaddr + SDHCI_CAPABILITIES_1);
>
> @@ -222,11 +222,6 @@ static int sdhci_at91_set_clks_presets(struct device *dev)
> preset_div = DIV_ROUND_UP(gck_rate, 50000000) - 1;
> writew(SDHCI_AT91_PRESET_COMMON_CONF | preset_div,
> host->ioaddr + SDHCI_PRESET_FOR_DDR50);
> -
> - clk_prepare_enable(priv->mainck);
> - clk_prepare_enable(priv->gck);
Ditto
> -
> - return 0;
> }
>
> static int sdhci_at91_suspend(struct device *dev)
> @@ -254,9 +249,11 @@ static int sdhci_at91_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> if (host->tuning_mode != SDHCI_TUNING_MODE_3)
> mmc_retune_needed(host->mmc);
>
> - clk_disable_unprepare(priv->gck);
> - clk_disable_unprepare(priv->hclock);
> - clk_disable_unprepare(priv->mainck);
> + if (!priv->soc_data->keep_clks_on) {
> + clk_disable_unprepare(priv->gck);
> + clk_disable_unprepare(priv->hclock);
> + clk_disable_unprepare(priv->mainck);
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -269,14 +266,23 @@ static int sdhci_at91_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> int ret;
>
> if (priv->restore_needed) {
> - ret = sdhci_at91_set_clks_presets(dev);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + if (!priv->soc_data->keep_clks_on)
> + clk_prepare_enable(priv->hclock);
> +
> + sdhci_at91_set_clks_presets(dev);
> +
> + if (!priv->soc_data->keep_clks_on) {
> + clk_prepare_enable(priv->mainck);
> + clk_prepare_enable(priv->gck);
> + }
Then that all becomes just:
sdhci_at91_set_clks_presets(dev, !priv->soc_data->keep_clks_on);
>
> priv->restore_needed = false;
> goto out;
> }
>
> + if (priv->soc_data->keep_clks_on)
> + goto out;
> +
> ret = clk_prepare_enable(priv->mainck);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(dev, "can't enable mainck\n");
> @@ -344,9 +350,10 @@ static int sdhci_at91_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(priv->gck),
> "failed to get multclk\n");
>
> - ret = sdhci_at91_set_clks_presets(&pdev->dev);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + clk_prepare_enable(priv->hclock);
> + sdhci_at91_set_clks_presets(&pdev->dev);
> + clk_prepare_enable(priv->mainck);
> + clk_prepare_enable(priv->gck);
And that all becomes just:
sdhci_at91_set_clks_presets(&pdev->dev, true);
>
> priv->restore_needed = false;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-09 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 13:25 [PATCH v2 0/6] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: add LAN969x support Robert Marko
2026-09-07 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: mmc: atmel,sama5d2-sdhci: add LAN969x compatible Robert Marko
2026-09-07 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: add option to keep clocks enabled Robert Marko
2026-09-09 10:31 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2026-09-07 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: add LAN969x support Robert Marko
2026-09-09 10:36 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-09-07 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] arm64: dts: microchip: lan969x: add SDMMC nodes Robert Marko
2026-09-07 13:58 ` Aubin Constans
2026-09-07 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] arm64: dts: microchip: ev23x71a: enable QSPI Robert Marko
2026-09-07 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] arm64: dts: microchip: ev23x71a: enable eMMC Robert Marko
2026-09-07 14:18 ` Aubin Constans
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=75a49f8d-eced-4b47-8184-0d1a0d0f1a01@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=aubin.constans@microchip.com \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ehristev@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luka.perkov@sartura.hr \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=robert.marko@sartura.hr \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=ulfh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®