mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Robert Marko <robert.marko@sartura.hr>, <ulfh@kernel.org>,
	<robh@kernel.org>, <krzk+dt@kernel.org>, <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	<nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>, <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	<claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>, <aubin.constans@microchip.com>,
	<ehristev@kernel.org>, <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <luka.perkov@sartura.hr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: add option to keep clocks enabled
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 13:31:13 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <75a49f8d-eced-4b47-8184-0d1a0d0f1a01@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907132617.1198548-3-robert.marko@sartura.hr>

On 07/09/2026 16:25, Robert Marko wrote:
> sdhci_at91_set_clks_presets() both enables the controller clocks and
> programs its capabilities and preset registers. This prevents callers from
> restoring the registers without changing the clock enable counts.
> 
> Move clock enablement to callers and add a SoC data flag for controllers
> that must keep their clocks enabled. Use it in the runtime PM paths while
> keeping register restoration separate from clock enablement.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robert.marko@sartura.hr>
> 
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c
> index 7c4ac65f247d..b7e2a89da348 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
>  struct sdhci_at91_soc_data {
>  	const struct sdhci_pltfm_data *pdata;
>  	bool baseclk_is_generated_internally;
> +	bool keep_clks_on;

It can be a bit easier to read when conditions do not have to be
inverted, like

	if (priv->soc_data->suspend_clks)

instead of:
	
	if (!priv->soc_data->keep_clks_on)


>  	unsigned int divider_for_baseclk;
>  };
>  
> @@ -164,7 +165,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id sdhci_at91_dt_match[] = {
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sdhci_at91_dt_match);
>  
> -static int sdhci_at91_set_clks_presets(struct device *dev)
> +static void sdhci_at91_set_clks_presets(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct sdhci_host *host = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>  	struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> @@ -174,7 +175,6 @@ static int sdhci_at91_set_clks_presets(struct device *dev)
>  	unsigned int			gck_rate, clk_base_rate;
>  	unsigned int			preset_div;
>  
> -	clk_prepare_enable(priv->hclock);

Might just as well pass in a parameter and:

	if (prepare_clks)
		clk_prepare_enable(priv->hclock);

>  	caps0 = readl(host->ioaddr + SDHCI_CAPABILITIES);
>  	caps1 = readl(host->ioaddr + SDHCI_CAPABILITIES_1);
>  
> @@ -222,11 +222,6 @@ static int sdhci_at91_set_clks_presets(struct device *dev)
>  	preset_div = DIV_ROUND_UP(gck_rate, 50000000) - 1;
>  	writew(SDHCI_AT91_PRESET_COMMON_CONF | preset_div,
>  	       host->ioaddr + SDHCI_PRESET_FOR_DDR50);
> -
> -	clk_prepare_enable(priv->mainck);
> -	clk_prepare_enable(priv->gck);

Ditto

> -
> -	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int sdhci_at91_suspend(struct device *dev)
> @@ -254,9 +249,11 @@ static int sdhci_at91_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  	if (host->tuning_mode != SDHCI_TUNING_MODE_3)
>  		mmc_retune_needed(host->mmc);
>  
> -	clk_disable_unprepare(priv->gck);
> -	clk_disable_unprepare(priv->hclock);
> -	clk_disable_unprepare(priv->mainck);
> +	if (!priv->soc_data->keep_clks_on) {
> +		clk_disable_unprepare(priv->gck);
> +		clk_disable_unprepare(priv->hclock);
> +		clk_disable_unprepare(priv->mainck);
> +	}
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -269,14 +266,23 @@ static int sdhci_at91_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	if (priv->restore_needed) {
> -		ret = sdhci_at91_set_clks_presets(dev);
> -		if (ret)
> -			return ret;
> +		if (!priv->soc_data->keep_clks_on)
> +			clk_prepare_enable(priv->hclock);
> +
> +		sdhci_at91_set_clks_presets(dev);
> +
> +		if (!priv->soc_data->keep_clks_on) {
> +			clk_prepare_enable(priv->mainck);
> +			clk_prepare_enable(priv->gck);
> +		}

Then that all becomes just:

		sdhci_at91_set_clks_presets(dev, !priv->soc_data->keep_clks_on);

>  
>  		priv->restore_needed = false;
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (priv->soc_data->keep_clks_on)
> +		goto out;
> +
>  	ret = clk_prepare_enable(priv->mainck);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "can't enable mainck\n");
> @@ -344,9 +350,10 @@ static int sdhci_at91_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(priv->gck),
>  				     "failed to get multclk\n");
>  
> -	ret = sdhci_at91_set_clks_presets(&pdev->dev);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> +	clk_prepare_enable(priv->hclock);
> +	sdhci_at91_set_clks_presets(&pdev->dev);
> +	clk_prepare_enable(priv->mainck);
> +	clk_prepare_enable(priv->gck);

And that all becomes just:

	sdhci_at91_set_clks_presets(&pdev->dev, true);

>  
>  	priv->restore_needed = false;
>  


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-09 10:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-07 13:25 [PATCH v2 0/6] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: add LAN969x support Robert Marko
2026-09-07 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: mmc: atmel,sama5d2-sdhci: add LAN969x compatible Robert Marko
2026-09-07 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: add option to keep clocks enabled Robert Marko
2026-09-09 10:31   ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2026-09-07 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: add LAN969x support Robert Marko
2026-09-09 10:36   ` Adrian Hunter
2026-09-07 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] arm64: dts: microchip: lan969x: add SDMMC nodes Robert Marko
2026-09-07 13:58   ` Aubin Constans
2026-09-07 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] arm64: dts: microchip: ev23x71a: enable QSPI Robert Marko
2026-09-07 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] arm64: dts: microchip: ev23x71a: enable eMMC Robert Marko
2026-09-07 14:18   ` Aubin Constans

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=75a49f8d-eced-4b47-8184-0d1a0d0f1a01@intel.com \
    --to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=aubin.constans@microchip.com \
    --cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ehristev@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luka.perkov@sartura.hr \
    --cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
    --cc=robert.marko@sartura.hr \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=ulfh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®