From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Use rq in idle_cpu_without()
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 10:45:43 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <75b01ec8-dda9-433e-8980-2d94593dd80c@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240103125648.194516-3-pierre.gondois@arm.com>
On 1/3/24 6:26 PM, Pierre Gondois wrote:
> idle_cpu_without() could receive a 'struct rq' instead of a
> cpu number to avoid converting the cpu number to a 'struct rq'
nit: s/cpu/CPU
> two times. Indeed update_sg_wakeup_stats() already makes the
> conversion.
This change looks good. There maybe other candidates which might get simplified
as well. for example, update_blocked_averages. (and then there are some
like balance_push_set which maybe borderline when it comes to such simplification)
>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 93e928e76959..d38fec26fd3d 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -10184,15 +10184,13 @@ static unsigned int task_running_on_cpu(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
>
> /**
> * idle_cpu_without - would a given CPU be idle without p ?
> - * @cpu: the processor on which idleness is tested.
> + * @rq: the rq on which idleness is tested.
> * @p: task which should be ignored.
> *
> * Return: 1 if the CPU would be idle. 0 otherwise.
> */
> -static int idle_cpu_without(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
> +static int idle_cpu_without(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
This might need change in the function name too. perception here is that, is the
CPU idle without task p.
Otherwise LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> {
> - struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
> -
> if (rq->curr != rq->idle && rq->curr != p)
> return 0;
>
> @@ -10247,7 +10245,7 @@ static inline void update_sg_wakeup_stats(struct sched_domain *sd,
> /*
> * No need to call idle_cpu_without() if nr_running is not 0
> */
> - if (!nr_running && idle_cpu_without(i, p))
> + if (!nr_running && idle_cpu_without(rq, p))
> sgs->idle_cpus++;
>
> /* Check if task fits in the CPU */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-04 5:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-03 12:56 [PATCH 0/2] Small cleanup around sparse report Pierre Gondois
2024-01-03 12:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched/topology: Annotate RCU pointers properly Pierre Gondois
2024-01-04 9:54 ` Valentin Schneider
2024-01-04 15:46 ` Pierre Gondois
2024-01-04 14:54 ` kernel test robot
2024-01-03 12:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Use rq in idle_cpu_without() Pierre Gondois
2024-01-04 5:15 ` Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
2024-01-04 16:12 ` Pierre Gondois
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=75b01ec8-dda9-433e-8980-2d94593dd80c@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=sshegde@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®