From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752622AbXCLTWJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:22:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752607AbXCLTVz (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:21:55 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.169]:28233 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752398AbXCLTVd (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:21:33 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=f/5DG865z6jMWf0z5lly2uYdKZp/bR3+pQY91PZAqOyXvcPraukSs9kwzVT+ARRVv8ArLd1xtdgvNSdq2wdMp0h2cc4p7o2UtVrq2Jpmdv7r5Mm+NU2gBDEli4Ez8kL33x+UxmKiQsvsVSpsNJYDi3ENDnN1kjkzV+4bpb7msAM= Message-ID: <75b66ecd0703121214r7a8d91cfh12c9ee9243188e03@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:14:30 -0400 From: "Lee Revell" To: "Gene Heskett" Subject: Re: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200703121510.18268.gene.heskett@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070311013506.GD10459@waste.org> <200703121428.29947.gene.heskett@gmail.com> <87wt1mjo4q.fsf@suzuka.mcnaught.org> <200703121510.18268.gene.heskett@gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: a59cb74b35691b7e Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 3/12/07, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday 12 March 2007, Douglas McNaught wrote: > >Gene Heskett writes: > >> I'd considered it, but with 32 dle entries, the whole strace output > >> would be terrabytes & I don't have THAT much disk. Not to mention it > >> traces only the parent process, so tar would be merrily marching along > >> to its own drummer and not traced I'm afraid. > > > >$ strace -ff > > > >-Doug > > Someone else suggested the single -f, and I tried that, but even with the > shell history set for 100,000 lines, i can't get back to the start, and I > think its mucking with the shell arguments numbering as what I can see is > about 5 reads through /etc/services accompanied by endless complaints > of -EBADFD, the the logfile it generates says the port it was given was > rejected when amcheck was run, here is that snip: Can we start a new thread for this amanda issue? It does not seem to have anything to do with Con's scheduler... Lee