From: "Lee Revell" <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: "Christian Kujau" <christian@g-house.de>
Cc: "Robert Hancock" <hancockr@shaw.ca>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Len Brown" <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.20.4: NETDEV WATCHDOG and lockups
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 11:41:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <75b66ecd0704030841r3783412doe27f3656169d7030@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704031620510.3963@sheep.housecafe.de>
On 4/3/07, Christian Kujau <christian@g-house.de> wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2007, Robert Hancock wrote:
> > Although it's not as bad with servers, many machines are designed to run only
> > Windows (which normally always uses ACPI) and simply aren't tested well or at
> > all with ACPI disabled so you can run into a lot of problems which are just
> > bugs in the BIOS, etc.
>
> I only thought it was the other way around: less (active, used) code -
> less bug (caused by strange ACPI implementations). But I can see your
> point.
>
We have a bunch of servers here where Linux will only see one core per
processor unless ACPI is enabled.
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-03 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fa.P3upyx4QAcXHtp/c/s+b4/cKk5w@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.u/RjoL2ybMMaAY+GDfTzm7jO5d0@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.G7qJfhdvOynxlffny+Xc1kIaqBY@ifi.uio.no>
2007-04-03 14:28 ` Robert Hancock
2007-04-03 15:26 ` Christian Kujau
2007-04-03 15:41 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2007-04-02 19:41 Christian Kujau
2007-04-02 20:20 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-04-02 21:15 ` Christian Kujau
2007-04-03 5:34 ` Christian Kujau
2007-04-03 15:17 ` Christian Kujau
2007-04-03 5:20 ` Len Brown
2007-04-03 5:46 ` Christian Kujau
2007-04-03 6:58 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-04-03 9:47 ` Christian Kujau
2007-04-03 15:19 ` Christian Kujau
2007-04-03 20:34 ` Francois Romieu
2007-04-04 11:21 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-04-04 13:20 ` Christian Kujau
2007-04-05 6:20 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-04-06 18:19 ` Christian Kujau
2007-04-06 18:27 ` Christian Kujau
2007-04-17 12:36 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-04-04 13:53 ` Denys
2007-04-04 17:34 ` Christian Kujau
2007-04-03 20:57 ` Francois Romieu
2007-04-04 13:12 ` Christian Kujau
2007-04-04 18:10 ` Francois Romieu
2007-04-04 18:57 ` Christian Kujau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=75b66ecd0704030841r3783412doe27f3656169d7030@mail.gmail.com \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=christian@g-house.de \
--cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®