From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>
Cc: Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com>,
Mika Westerberg <westeri@kernel.org>,
Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@gmail.com>,
usb4-upstream@oss.qualcomm.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thunderbolt: debugfs: Don't stop reading SB registers if just one fails
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2026 14:59:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <75c962d1-7ade-483b-bbc9-a6c6140fc0e9@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260409120457.GH3552@black.igk.intel.com>
On 4/9/26 2:04 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2026 at 01:22:01PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>
>> The GEN4 TxFFE register is not part of the USB4 v1.0 specification, so
>> understandably some pre-USB4v2 retimers (like the Parade PS8830) don't
>> seem to implement it.
>>
>> The immediate idea to counter this would be to introduce a version
>> check for that specific register, but on a second thought, the current
>> flow only returns a quiet -EIO if there's _any_ failures, without
>> hinting at what the actual problem is.
>
> Please don't use _any_ emphasis in the commit messages here or in the
> future.
If I must, I shall.. other maintainers don't mind.
>> To take care of both of these issues, simply print an error line for
>> each SB register read that fails and go on with attempting to read the
>> others.
>>
>> Note that this is not quite in-spec behavior ("The SB Register Space
>> registers shall have the structure and fields described in Table 4-17.
>> Registers not listed in Table 4-20 are undefined and shall not be
>> used."), but it's the easiest fix that shouldn't (TM) have real-world
>> bad side effects.
>
> Also drop the "(TM)" thing.
>
> I assume you have tested this on a hardware that supports this too, right?
Hardware that exposes that register this does not exercise the altered
code path.
>> Fixes: 6d241fa00159 ("thunderbolt: Add sideband register access to debugfs")
>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/thunderbolt/debugfs.c | 6 ++++--
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thunderbolt/debugfs.c b/drivers/thunderbolt/debugfs.c
>> index 042f6a0d0f7f..8237e1ea6d09 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thunderbolt/debugfs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thunderbolt/debugfs.c
>> @@ -2361,8 +2361,10 @@ static int sb_regs_show(struct tb_port *port, const struct sb_reg *sb_regs,
>> memset(data, 0, sizeof(data));
>> ret = usb4_port_sb_read(port, target, index, regs->reg, data,
>> regs->size);
>> - if (ret)
>> - return ret;
>> + if (ret) {
>> + seq_printf(s, "0x%02x Error reading register: %d\n", regs->reg, ret);
>
> Why not tb_port_dgb/warn()() here instead so it goes into dmesg, not to the
> output.
Because when one reads out sys/debugfs, it's generally expected that the
related output is provided there.
If we don't want to print the retval, I can copy the message that's printed
when switch/port capabilities readout fails, i.e.
-- drivers/thunderbolt/debugfs.c : cap_show_by_dw()
if (port)
ret = tb_port_read(port, &data, TB_CFG_PORT, cap + offset + i, 1);
else
ret = tb_sw_read(sw, &data, TB_CFG_SWITCH, cap + offset + i, 1);
if (ret) {
seq_printf(s, "0x%04x <not accessible>\n", cap + offset + i);
continue;
}
Konrad
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-09 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-09 11:22 Konrad Dybcio
2026-04-09 12:04 ` Mika Westerberg
2026-04-09 12:59 ` Konrad Dybcio [this message]
2026-04-09 14:32 ` Mika Westerberg
2026-04-10 14:29 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-04-10 14:43 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-04-10 15:10 ` Mika Westerberg
2026-04-10 17:27 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-04-13 4:38 ` Mika Westerberg
2026-04-10 14:44 ` Mika Westerberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=75c962d1-7ade-483b-bbc9-a6c6140fc0e9@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=YehezkelShB@gmail.com \
--cc=andreas.noever@gmail.com \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=usb4-upstream@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=westeri@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®