From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out30-110.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-110.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.110]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EE8633FE36 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2026 02:27:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.110 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773368861; cv=none; b=IDeYKZScYtbW0JWeHIX8SjcdFPc8dNNaw/1LUiAASgJejJfwt8H2FLpTGqumP06lp35HyReDz+n+eDnLCRdLPckioqqc88Q8QSCHCLzml56hFY6RaU3nl42/fID+my40CaYVWAO53cYoTtv6aTOtrTRhi0ob/SHRUXbuciSL1iI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773368861; c=relaxed/simple; bh=b9SXnmBnOaAHrStoyDuECQm8EP0VE67rplyIxasg3QM=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=rbp9NfaUmqNjb5JKJOMj8Ynb9fceLzP7NpnxcWUDF5C1VIywpUSCdAZNCi0k0d1wPeMzhMo7Xn33wF5qLT6cSLcYWf6LslRLPbjFyoB+ZOy6tO5CJFGTwpjZq4vNROkUhSWqWhfqS9zWHPTN+v9/Ei1qHgIn4wG9cLs/1CO3pUE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b=ylITBevw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.110 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b="ylITBevw" DKIM-Signature:v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.alibaba.com; s=default; t=1773368851; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From:Content-Type; bh=P2/OSQUGfORN8iIc46PjhNzjHY+wvGwwN5dwLXZYc+A=; b=ylITBevwP+GGz9r6nIxtoVWASqcKsKnmTgwBUItdc2ntqfhwwg/JjNIiOM4p1LRAqA+R/hiUZpb5+hpqQxiaHW+jNyK7m74VGpNH38oKOL2WJ/8v4xK9RAF7wj5B47hFcOVPirO8vlbIQM8pDRT67eMpXCIOWVuU9BNILtaPp8I= X-Alimail-AntiSpam:AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R811e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=maildocker-contentspam033037026112;MF=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=4;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0X-qTJep_1773368850; Received: from 30.221.129.56(mailfrom:joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0X-qTJep_1773368850 cluster:ay36) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Fri, 13 Mar 2026 10:27:30 +0800 Message-ID: <75f89a17-213b-42a0-a30e-d52fb2d077a6@linux.alibaba.com> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 10:27:28 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] ocfs2: split transactions in dio completion to avoid credit exhaustion To: Heming Zhao Cc: ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara References: <20260312162725.15523-1-heming.zhao@suse.com> <20260312162725.15523-2-heming.zhao@suse.com> From: Joseph Qi In-Reply-To: <20260312162725.15523-2-heming.zhao@suse.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 3/13/26 12:27 AM, Heming Zhao wrote: > During ocfs2 dio operations, JBD2 may report warnings via following call trace: > ocfs2_dio_end_io_write > ocfs2_mark_extent_written > ocfs2_change_extent_flag > ocfs2_split_extent > ocfs2_try_to_merge_extent > ocfs2_extend_rotate_transaction > ocfs2_extend_trans > jbd2__journal_restart > start_this_handle > output: JBD2: kworker/6:2 wants too many credits credits:5450 rsv_credits:0 max:5449 > > To prevent exceeding the credits limit, modify ocfs2_dio_end_io_write() to > handle each extent in a separate transaction. > > Additionally, relocate ocfs2_del_inode_from_orphan(). The orphan inode should > only be removed from the orphan list after the extent tree update is complete. > this ensures that if a crash occurs in the middle of extent tree updates, we > won't leave stale blocks beyond EOF. > > This patch also removes the only call to ocfs2_assure_trans_credits(), which > was introduced by commit be346c1a6eeb ("ocfs2: fix DIO failure due to > insufficient transaction credits"). > > Finally, thanks to Jans for providing the bug fix prototype and suggestions. > > Suggested-by: Jan Kara > Signed-off-by: Heming Zhao > --- > fs/ocfs2/aops.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c > index 09146b43d1f0..91997b330d39 100644 > --- a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c > @@ -2294,18 +2294,6 @@ static int ocfs2_dio_end_io_write(struct inode *inode, > goto out; > } > > - /* Delete orphan before acquire i_rwsem. */ > - if (dwc->dw_orphaned) { > - BUG_ON(dwc->dw_writer_pid != task_pid_nr(current)); > - > - end = end > i_size_read(inode) ? end : 0; > - > - ret = ocfs2_del_inode_from_orphan(osb, inode, di_bh, > - !!end, end); > - if (ret < 0) > - mlog_errno(ret); > - } > - > down_write(&oi->ip_alloc_sem); > di = (struct ocfs2_dinode *)di_bh->b_data; > > @@ -2326,44 +2314,56 @@ static int ocfs2_dio_end_io_write(struct inode *inode, > > credits = ocfs2_calc_extend_credits(inode->i_sb, &di->id2.i_list); > > - handle = ocfs2_start_trans(osb, credits); > - if (IS_ERR(handle)) { > - ret = PTR_ERR(handle); > - mlog_errno(ret); > - goto unlock; > - } > - ret = ocfs2_journal_access_di(handle, INODE_CACHE(inode), di_bh, > - OCFS2_JOURNAL_ACCESS_WRITE); > - if (ret) { > - mlog_errno(ret); > - goto commit; > - } > - > list_for_each_entry(ue, &dwc->dw_zero_list, ue_node) { > - ret = ocfs2_assure_trans_credits(handle, credits); Since now no any caller for ocfs2_assure_trans_credits(), we may remove it in PATCH 2 of this series. Thanks, Joseph > - if (ret < 0) { > + handle = ocfs2_start_trans(osb, credits); > + if (IS_ERR(handle)) { > + ret = PTR_ERR(handle); > mlog_errno(ret); > break; > } > + ret = ocfs2_journal_access_di(handle, INODE_CACHE(inode), di_bh, > + OCFS2_JOURNAL_ACCESS_WRITE); > + if (ret) { > + mlog_errno(ret); > + ocfs2_commit_trans(osb, handle); > + break; > + } > ret = ocfs2_mark_extent_written(inode, &et, handle, > ue->ue_cpos, 1, > ue->ue_phys, > meta_ac, &dealloc); > if (ret < 0) { > mlog_errno(ret); > + ocfs2_commit_trans(osb, handle); > break; > } > + ocfs2_commit_trans(osb, handle); > } > > if (end > i_size_read(inode)) { > + handle = ocfs2_start_trans(osb, credits); > + if (IS_ERR(handle)) { > + ret = PTR_ERR(handle); > + mlog_errno(ret); > + goto unlock; > + } > ret = ocfs2_set_inode_size(handle, inode, di_bh, end); > if (ret < 0) > mlog_errno(ret); > + ocfs2_commit_trans(osb, handle); > } > -commit: > - ocfs2_commit_trans(osb, handle); > + > unlock: > up_write(&oi->ip_alloc_sem); > + > + /* everything looks good, let's start the cleanup */ > + if (dwc->dw_orphaned) { > + BUG_ON(dwc->dw_writer_pid != task_pid_nr(current)); > + > + ret = ocfs2_del_inode_from_orphan(osb, inode, di_bh, 0, 0); > + if (ret < 0) > + mlog_errno(ret); > + } > ocfs2_inode_unlock(inode, 1); > brelse(di_bh); > out: