From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759725Ab2KBVrO (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Nov 2012 17:47:14 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([193.178.161.156]:53151 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758662Ab2KBVrK (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Nov 2012 17:47:10 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Jesse Barnes Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Suspend/resume without VT switches Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 22:51:07 +0100 Message-ID: <7608326.fQBj17U8Wv@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.8.5 (Linux/3.7.0-rc3; KDE/4.8.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1351892621-4840-1-git-send-email-jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> References: <1351892621-4840-1-git-send-email-jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday, November 02, 2012 02:43:39 PM Jesse Barnes wrote: > I've lightly tested this with X and it definitely makes my > suspend/resume sequence a bit prettier. It should speed things up > trivally as well, but most of those gains come from other changes to the > i915 driver (posted earlier to intel-gfx). > > Any thoughts? I like the idea. > I suspect we'll have to be more defensive about the > resume configuration in case the BIOS did something weird, but overall I > think we should be able to do this one way or another. Perhaps patch [1/2] should be [2/2] and vice versa? :-) Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.