From: Christophe LEROY <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, jishi@redhat.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: fix csum_ipv6_magic() on little endian platforms
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 14:27:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <76289d79-0e7e-7b22-2364-0b5777f42c8b@c-s.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADvbK_c+VVoC=tcX4z-NbX6xGHfkzzNuBXoMHFJfZdiBMzX3+w@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Michael,
Le 10/09/2018 à 16:28, Xin Long a écrit :
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 2:09 PM Christophe Leroy
> <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> wrote:
>>
>> On little endian platforms, csum_ipv6_magic() keeps len and proto in
>> CPU byte order. This generates a bad results leading to ICMPv6 packets
>> from other hosts being dropped by powerpc64le platforms.
>>
>> In order to fix this, len and proto should be converted to network
>> byte order ie bigendian byte order. However checksumming 0x12345678
>> and 0x56341278 provide the exact same result so it is enough to
>> rotate the sum of len and proto by 1 byte.
>>
>> PPC32 only support bigendian so the fix is needed for PPC64 only
>>
>> Fixes: e9c4943a107b ("powerpc: Implement csum_ipv6_magic in assembly")
>> Reported-by: Jianlin Shi <jishi@redhat.com>
>> Reported-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.18+
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/lib/checksum_64.S | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/checksum_64.S b/arch/powerpc/lib/checksum_64.S
>> index 886ed94b9c13..2a68c43e13f5 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/checksum_64.S
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/checksum_64.S
>> @@ -443,6 +443,9 @@ _GLOBAL(csum_ipv6_magic)
>> addc r0, r8, r9
>> ld r10, 0(r4)
>> ld r11, 8(r4)
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
>> + rotldi r5, r5, 8
>> +#endif
>> adde r0, r0, r10
>> add r5, r5, r7
>> adde r0, r0, r11
>> --
>> 2.13.3
>>
> Tested-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
>
Could you take this fix for 4.19 ?
Unless someone takes it through the netdev tree ?
Thanks
Christophe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-17 12:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-10 6:09 Christophe Leroy
2018-09-10 14:28 ` Xin Long
2018-09-17 12:27 ` Christophe LEROY [this message]
2018-09-21 11:59 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=76289d79-0e7e-7b22-2364-0b5777f42c8b@c-s.fr \
--to=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jishi@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®