mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@kernel.org>
To: Angelo Dureghello <adureghello@baylibre.com>
Cc: linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	arnd@kernel.org, Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org>,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/4] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-mcf: do not use readl()/writel() on ColdFire
Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 17:17:09 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <76942c55-5918-4ec3-a75e-4717e4e3eb01@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALSJ-wDuXfMzV=Ydic-2S=2v+jbe034gqmy+wr-R1d14LBxuFQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Angelo,

On 18/5/26 05:00, Angelo Dureghello wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 12:26:46AM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
>> From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org>
>>
>> The implementation of the readX() and writeX() family of IO access
>> functions is non-standard on ColdFire platforms. They check the supplied
>> IO address and will return either big or little endian results based on
>> that check. This is non-standard, they are expected to always return
>> little-endian byte ordered data. Unfortunately this behavior also means
>> that ioreadX()/iowroteX() and their big-endian counter parts
>> ioreadXbe()/iowriteXbe() are wrong. This is now in the process of being
>> cleaned up and fixed.
>>
>> Change the use of the readX() and writeX() access functions in this driver
>> to use the recently defined specific ColdFire internal SoC hardware IO
>> access functions mcf_read8()/mcf_read16()/mcf_read32() and
>> mcf_write8()/mcf_write16()/mcf_write32().
>>
>> There is no functional change to the driver. Though it does have the
>> effect of making the IO access slightly more efficient, since there is
>> no longer a need to do the address check at every register access.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org>
[snip]
> 
> Tested this now on stmark2, sdcard mount/umount/read/write/erase works
> as usual. Thanks.
> 
> Acked-by: Angelo Dureghello <adureghello@baylibre.com>
> Tested-by: Angelo Dureghello <adureghello@baylibre.com>

Fantastic, thanks testing.

Regards
Greg


  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-18  7:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-06 14:26 [RFC 1/4] net: fec: do not use readl()/writel() for ColdFire Greg Ungerer
2026-05-06 14:26 ` [RFC 2/4] net: smc91x: do not use readw()/writew() on ColdFire platforms Greg Ungerer
2026-05-06 14:26 ` [RFC 3/4] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-mcf: do not use readl()/writel() on ColdFire Greg Ungerer
2026-05-11 15:11   ` Ulf Hansson
2026-06-09 14:31     ` Greg Ungerer
2026-05-17 19:00   ` Angelo Dureghello
2026-05-18  7:17     ` Greg Ungerer [this message]
2026-05-06 14:26 ` [RFC 4/4] m68k: coldfire: fix non-standard readX()/writeX() functions Greg Ungerer
2026-05-06 16:14   ` Frank Li
2026-05-06 19:12   ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-05-07 12:43     ` Greg Ungerer
2026-05-07 12:59       ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-05-17 19:43       ` Angelo Dureghello
2026-05-17 20:08         ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-05-17 22:04           ` Angelo Dureghello
2026-05-17 22:41             ` Angelo Dureghello
2026-05-24 21:17               ` Angelo Dureghello
2026-05-24 21:34                 ` Angelo Dureghello
2026-05-25 13:39                   ` Angelo Dureghello
2026-05-31 13:42                   ` Greg Ungerer
2026-06-01 14:43                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-09 21:30                       ` Angelo Dureghello
2026-06-10  0:39                         ` Greg Ungerer
2026-05-07 13:30   ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-05-07 14:33     ` Greg Ungerer
2026-05-08  2:46 ` [RFC 1/4] net: fec: do not use readl()/writel() for ColdFire Wei Fang
2026-05-08  8:40   ` David Laight
2026-05-08 13:14     ` Greg Ungerer
2026-05-08 13:11   ` Greg Ungerer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=76942c55-5918-4ec3-a75e-4717e4e3eb01@kernel.org \
    --to=gerg@kernel.org \
    --cc=adureghello@baylibre.com \
    --cc=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=gerg@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome