From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com>
Cc: mst@redhat.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] vdpa/mlx5: Only return vq ready if vq is initialized
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 15:29:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <76a44f0b-91c7-595b-f3a8-1d07e2f1bc78@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210601102129.GB215954@mtl-vdi-166.wap.labs.mlnx>
在 2021/6/1 下午6:21, Eli Cohen 写道:
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 01:03:36PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> 在 2021/6/1 下午12:13, Eli Cohen 写道:
>>> On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 10:18:04AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>> 在 2021/6/1 上午12:04, Eli Cohen 写道:
>>>>> Only return the value of the ready field if the VQ is initialized in
>>>>> which case the value of the field is valid.
>>>>>
>>>>> Failing to do so can result in virtio_vdpa failing to load if the device
>>>>> was previously used by vhost_vdpa and the old values are ready.
>>>>> virtio_vdpa expects to find VQs in "not ready" state.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 1a86b377aa21 ("vdpa/mlx5: Add VDPA driver for supported mlx5 devices")
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c | 2 +-
>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
>>>>> index 02a05492204c..f6b680d2ab1c 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
>>>>> @@ -1407,7 +1407,7 @@ static bool mlx5_vdpa_get_vq_ready(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u16 idx)
>>>>> struct mlx5_vdpa_net *ndev = to_mlx5_vdpa_ndev(mvdev);
>>>>> struct mlx5_vdpa_virtqueue *mvq = &ndev->vqs[idx];
>>>>> - return mvq->ready;
>>>>> + return mvq->initialized && mvq->ready;
>>>> I think the more suitable fix is to reset mvq->ready during reset. The
>>>> vq_ready should follow the queue_enable semantic in virtio-pci:
>>>>
>>>> "
>>>> The device MUST present a 0 in queue_enable on reset.
>>>> "
>>> Thinking again, I think we should call set_vq_ready() from
>>> qemu/virtio_vdpa etc. after reset to explicitly set ready to false.
>>
>> This is not what I read from the spec and how the current driver behave.
>>
>> And I don't see why we need to stick to 1 after the reset.
> Like you said below, this must be clarified by the spec.
I will add this to my todo list.
> Because my
> understanding of the text is that the ready flag is a means for the
> driver to tell the device whether it may or may not execute requests. So
> following this reasoning, the driver should tell the device when ready
> should be zero. As you suggest, after reset.
Another thought, reset should prevent the device from executing requests
on each queue. In this case, presenting vq_ready to zero make sense.
Otherwise there would be a conflict.
Thanks
>
> Meanwhile I am going to change the code to reset ready after device
> reset.
>
>>
>>> The ready indication is not necessairily a reflection of the hardware
>>> queue:
>>>
>>> "Virtual queue ready bit
>>> Writing one (0x1) to this register notifies the device that it can
>>> execute requests from this virtual queue. Reading from this register
>>> returns the last value written to it. Both read and write accesses apply
>>> to the queue selected by writing to QueueSel."
>>
>> My understanding that this applies if not reset in the middle. We can
>> clarify this in the spec if needed.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> }
>>>>> static int mlx5_vdpa_set_vq_state(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u16 idx,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-02 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-31 16:04 Eli Cohen
2021-06-01 2:18 ` Jason Wang
2021-06-01 3:42 ` Eli Cohen
2021-06-01 4:13 ` Eli Cohen
2021-06-01 5:03 ` Jason Wang
2021-06-01 10:21 ` Eli Cohen
2021-06-02 7:29 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2021-06-02 7:43 ` Eli Cohen
2021-06-02 8:57 ` Eli Cohen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=76a44f0b-91c7-595b-f3a8-1d07e2f1bc78@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=elic@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®