mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@kylinos.cn>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@kernel.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] PM: suspend: clean up redundant filesystems_freeze/thaw handling
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 14:12:40 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <76a87abf-8fc9-445b-83d5-0daa33746014@kylinos.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0g22fMDc21yV2svePf_4BWZRrcy+b3-efpbfAGLpa2=Lw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Rafael,

在 2025/7/15 01:57, Rafael J. Wysocki 写道:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 10:44 AM Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@kylinos.cn> wrote:
>> Hi Rafael,
>>
>> Just a gentle ping on this patch.
> I've lost track of it for some reason, sorry.
>
>> I realized I forgot to mention an important motivation in the changelog:
>> calling filesystems_freeze() twice (from both suspend_prepare() and
>> enter_state()) lead to a black screen and make the system unable to resume..
>>
>> This patch avoids the duplicate call and resolves that issue.
> Now applied as a fix for 6.16-rc7, thank you!


Thanks for the reply!

Just a quick follow-up question — we noticed that even when the “freeze 
filesystems” feature is not enabled, the current code still calls 
filesystems_thaw().

Do you think it would make sense to guard this with a static key (or 
another mechanism) to avoid unnecessary overhead?



>> 在 2025/7/12 11:08, Zihuan Zhang 写道:
>>> The recently introduced support for freezing filesystems during system
>>> suspend included calls to filesystems_freeze() in both suspend_prepare()
>>> and enter_state(), as well as calls to filesystems_thaw() in both
>>> suspend_finish() and the Unlock path in enter_state(). These are
>>> redundant.
>>>
>>> - filesystems_freeze() is already called in suspend_prepare(), which is
>>>     the proper and consistent place to handle pre-suspend operations. The
>>> second call in enter_state() is unnecessary and removed.
>>>
>>> - filesystems_thaw() is invoked in suspend_finish(), which covers
>>>     successful suspend/resume paths. In the failure case , we add a call
>>> to filesystems_thaw() only when needed, avoiding the duplicate call in
>>> the general Unlock path.
>>>
>>> This change simplifies the suspend code and avoids repeated freeze/thaw
>>> calls, while preserving correct ordering and behavior.
>>>
>>> Fixes: eacfbf74196f91e4c26d9f8c78e1576c1225cd8c ("power: freeze filesystems during suspend/resume")
>>> Signed-off-by: Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@kylinos.cn>
>>> ---
>>>    kernel/power/suspend.c | 4 +---
>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/kernel/power/suspend.c b/kernel/power/suspend.c
>>> index bb608b68fb30..8f3e4c48d5cd 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/power/suspend.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/power/suspend.c
>>> @@ -384,6 +384,7 @@ static int suspend_prepare(suspend_state_t state)
>>>                return 0;
>>>
>>>        dpm_save_failed_step(SUSPEND_FREEZE);
>>> +     filesystems_thaw();
>>>        pm_notifier_call_chain(PM_POST_SUSPEND);
>>>     Restore:
>>>        pm_restore_console();
>>> @@ -593,8 +594,6 @@ static int enter_state(suspend_state_t state)
>>>                ksys_sync_helper();
>>>                trace_suspend_resume(TPS("sync_filesystems"), 0, false);
>>>        }
>>> -     if (filesystem_freeze_enabled)
>>> -             filesystems_freeze();
>>>
>>>        pm_pr_dbg("Preparing system for sleep (%s)\n", mem_sleep_labels[state]);
>>>        pm_suspend_clear_flags();
>>> @@ -614,7 +613,6 @@ static int enter_state(suspend_state_t state)
>>>        pm_pr_dbg("Finishing wakeup.\n");
>>>        suspend_finish();
>>>     Unlock:
>>> -     filesystems_thaw();
>>>        mutex_unlock(&system_transition_mutex);
>>>        return error;
>>>    }
>> Thanks,
>> Zihuan Zhang
Best regards,
Zihuan Zhang

  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-15  6:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-12  3:08 Zihuan Zhang
2025-07-14  8:44 ` Zihuan Zhang
2025-07-14 17:57   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-07-15  6:12     ` Zihuan Zhang [this message]
2025-07-15 12:48       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-07-16  2:04         ` Zihuan Zhang
2025-07-16 12:23           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-07-17  0:37             ` Zihuan Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=76a87abf-8fc9-445b-83d5-0daa33746014@kylinos.cn \
    --to=zhangzihuan@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®