Re: [PATCH v2] drm/msm/dpu: always program dsc active bits

[Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>]

On 4/14/2023 3:52 PM, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> On 2023-04-14 14:03:23, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> [..]
>>>> Yes, ofcourse git send-email was used to send the patch, not any other
>>>> mail client.
>>>>
>>>> Yes i am also aware that send-email converts rb to CC.
>>>>
>>>> But if you keep working on the local branch, then you would have to
>>>> manually add the r-bs. If you use am of the prev version and develop on
>>>> that, it will automatically add the r-bs.
> 
> I don't think git-am is smart enough to fetch additional replies from
> lore and apply the reviewed-by (and other trailers).  This workflow
> relies on downloading the mbox from a service that extracts and
> accumulates the trailers such as patchwork, see for example:
> 
> 	https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/116340/revisions/1/mbox/
> 
> Note that it also picked up one sentence starting with Fixes:
> 
> 	Fixes: tag below seems extraneous.
> 

Yes, I usually use git-pw ap.

So perhaps, I should have been more specific to say that.

Some form of am is what i wanted to emphasize but just wrote git am by 
mistake.

> On the other hand b4 (shaz)am is itself capable of downloading the whole
> mail thread and appending all trailers, just like patchwork is doing
> above, in one automated `b4 shazam <lore link>` command.
> 
> And to solve the problem of trailers arriving in your inbox after
> working on the next revision in a local branch - or without ever even
> redownloading the series from lore/patchwork¸ b4 has a command to
> download and apply them to commits in your local branch:
> 
> 	b4 trailers -uF <lore link>
> 
> Try it out, b4 is amazing :)
> 

Yes, i recently started using it to send "applied" emails as suggested 
by Dmitry , for patch related work was still using git-pw.

Perhaps, I will switch completely to it.

> [..]
>> 2) I synced with kuogee. his git version seems to be quite old which is
>> not adding the folks from r-b to cc. So there was nothing wrong with
>> invocation, just versioning.
> 
> You are right.  The X-Mailer header of Kuogee's patch indicates git
> 2.7.4, while cc'ing of additional -by trailers (such as r-b's) was only
> introduced in 2.20.0:
> 
> https://github.com/git/git/commit/ef0cc1df90f6b6c2987ab2db8e0ccf2cfc421edf
> 
> Fwiw 2.7.4 is from March 2016.
> 
> - Marijn