Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] soc/tegra: pmc: Specify restart mode

[Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>]

On 8/9/23 22:24, Benjamin Bara wrote:
> From: Benjamin Bara <benjamin.bara@skidata.com>
> 
> The current restart handler registration does not specify whether the
> restart is a cold or a warm one. Now, as do_kernel_restart() knows about
> the type, the priorization is implicitly done (cold restarts are
> executed first) and the reboot_mode kernel parameter (which is currently
> mostly ignored) can be respected.
> 
> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Bara <benjamin.bara@skidata.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - improve commit message
> ---
>  drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
> index 162f52456f65..4f42febb9b0f 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
> @@ -2962,7 +2962,7 @@ static int tegra_pmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	}
>  
>  	err = devm_register_sys_off_handler(&pdev->dev,
> -					    SYS_OFF_MODE_RESTART,
> +					    SYS_OFF_MODE_RESTART_WARM,
>  					    SYS_OFF_PRIO_LOW,
>  					    tegra_pmc_restart_handler, NULL);
>  	if (err) {
> 

You have tegra-pmc restart handler that uses low priority. And then
you're adding cold/warm handlers to tps65219 and pca9450 drivers with a
default priorities. Hence this cold/warm separation of handlers doesn't
do any practical difference in yours case because tegra-pmc will never
be used as it did before your changes?

Previously you wanted to make tps6586x driver to skip the warm reboot,
but you're not touching tps6586x in this patchset. There is no real
problem that is solved by these patches?

-- 
Best regards,
Dmitry