mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] coresight: Introduce support for Coresight Address Translation Unit
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 10:37:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <76e0bc22-468c-6215-de54-3e4ead42e17c@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180620214157.GA20697@xps15>

Hi Mathieu,

On 20/06/1822:41, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Hi Suzuki,
> 
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 11:56:16AM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>> Add the initial support for Coresight Address Translation Unit, which
>> augments the TMC in Coresight SoC-600 by providing an improved Scatter
>> Gather mechanism. CATU is always connected to a single TMC-ETR and
>> converts the AXI address with a translated address (from a given SG
>> table with specific format). The CATU should be programmed in pass
>> through mode and enabled if the ETR doesn't translation by CATU.
> 
> To me this sentence look broken.
> 

Yes, it is broken. It should have been :

"The CATU should be programmed in pass through mode and enabled
even if the ETR doesn't use the translation by CATU."


>> +static int catu_disable_hw(struct catu_drvdata *drvdata)
>> +{
>> +	int rc = 0;
>> +
>> +	if (catu_wait_for_ready(drvdata)) {
>> +		dev_info(drvdata->dev, "Timeout while waiting for READY\n");
>> +		rc = -EAGAIN;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	catu_write_control(drvdata, 0);
> 
> Is waiting for the ready bit before switching the component off comes from
> experimentation with the HW (i.e FPGA)?  From what the reference manual
> indicate, CONTROL.ENABLE should be set to 0 first, and then wait for
> STATUS.READY.

You're right. It should be in the reverse order. I will fix it in the next version.

Thanks
Suzuki

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-21  9:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-18 10:56 [PATCH 0/6] coresight: Coresight Address Translation Unit support Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-18 10:56 ` [PATCH 1/6] coresight: Cleanup device subtype struct Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-18 10:56 ` [PATCH 2/6] coresight: Add helper device type Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-18 10:56 ` [PATCH 3/6] coresight: Introduce support for Coresight Address Translation Unit Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-20 21:41   ` Mathieu Poirier
2018-06-21  9:37     ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2018-06-18 10:56 ` [PATCH 4/6] dts: bindings: Document device tree binding for CATU Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-18 10:56 ` [PATCH 5/6] coresight: catu: Add support for scatter gather tables Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-21 17:13   ` Mathieu Poirier
2018-06-22  9:01     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-22 14:38       ` Mathieu Poirier
2018-06-18 10:56 ` [PATCH 6/6] coresight: catu: Plug in CATU as a backend for ETR buffer Suzuki K Poulose

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=76e0bc22-468c-6215-de54-3e4ead42e17c@arm.com \
    --to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®