From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752837AbeBFMQZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Feb 2018 07:16:25 -0500 Received: from vulcan.natalenko.name ([104.207.131.136]:52528 "EHLO vulcan.natalenko.name" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752475AbeBFMQS (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Feb 2018 07:16:18 -0500 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 vulcan.natalenko.name 68ACC2E5B47 Authentication-Results: vulcan.natalenko.name; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=natalenko.name MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 13:16:16 +0100 From: Oleksandr Natalenko To: Mike Galbraith Cc: Paolo Valente , Jens Axboe , linux-block , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Ulf Hansson , Mark Brown , Linus Walleij , "'Paolo Valente' via bfq-iosched" , Alban Browaeys , ming.lei@redhat.com, ivan@ludios.org, 169364@studenti.unimore.it, Serena Ziviani Subject: Re: [PATCH BUGFIX 1/1] block, bfq: add requeue-request hook In-Reply-To: <1517918234.25841.31.camel@gmx.de> References: <20180205190510.5499-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org> <20180205190510.5499-2-paolo.valente@linaro.org> <1517903761.9843.12.camel@gmx.de> <899B68CC-5955-4418-8BFF-DC55A743A61B@linaro.org> <1517918234.25841.31.camel@gmx.de> Message-ID: <77124223e6116350a5184a5199850304@natalenko.name> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.3 ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=natalenko.name; s=arc-20170712; t=1517919376; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=oLoH42cZvTFblyd4Wkf8grsXI08IMJ4l6mJLkEZZrAg=; b=LT4KNDLSDY1KopLSnLfdMmMYsf/mPGFmgFBJO2KfQPz/e31IaBbHh30GLhMSQOAvl3uSjw 0bNAsUA+y/CKpWGGDHe+sPsJkDiiHvFn846eYyEDAeDtzUIGrZ0P9WgBJ11UVT2Bt/I9Y2 kCi6CtQToxpv5avljwAvU6WK0GPiZ2I= ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20170712; d=natalenko.name; t=1517919376; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=S29LtDtrvuL746fI9wvKovTBKcqHBOlBDAetgxryTJIE5bfuddRY/HWBTO8Od/4j4OhNhbO87rJN1vepqPrxAL1Rj5AzlgYcyX3jEstknaPdTzAB3qweZIEZ0p0TsSate5/CaIT29mbfbzGTIfZjPk6F7KUmKNOO6mzDQaUF3KM= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; auth=pass smtp.auth=oleksandr@natalenko.name smtp.mailfrom=oleksandr@natalenko.name Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi. 06.02.2018 12:57, Mike Galbraith wrote: > Not me.  Box seems to be fairly sure that it is bfq. Twice again box > went belly up on me in fairly short order with bfq, but seemed fine > with deadline. I'm currently running deadline again, and box again > seems solid, thought I won't say _is_ solid until it's been happily > trundling along with deadline for a quite a bit longer. Sorry for the noise, but just to make it clear, are we talking about "deadline" or "mq-deadline" now?