Re: [PATCH v3] mm/slub: Avoid list corruption when removing a slab from the full list

[Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>]

On 10/13/24 22:46, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Oct 2024, yuan.gao wrote:
> 
>> On 24/10/11 11:07AM, Christoph Lameter (Ampere) wrote:
>> > On Fri, 11 Oct 2024, yuan.gao wrote:
>> > 
>> > > When an object belonging to the slab got freed later, the remove_full()
>> > > function is called. Because the slab is neither on the partial list nor
>> > > on the full list, it eventually lead to a list corruption.
>> > 
>> > We detect list poison....
>> > 
>> > > diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h
>> > > index 6c6fe6d630ce..7681e71d9a13 100644
>> > > --- a/mm/slab.h
>> > > +++ b/mm/slab.h
>> > > @@ -73,6 +73,10 @@ struct slab {
>> > >  						struct {
>> > >  							unsigned inuse:16;
>> > >  							unsigned objects:15;
>> > > +							/*
>> > > +							 * Reuse frozen bit for slab with debug enabled:
>> > 
>> > "If slab debugging is enabled then the frozen bit can bereused to
>> >  indicate that the slab was corrupted"
>> > 
>> > > index 5b832512044e..b9265e9f11aa 100644
>> > > --- a/mm/slub.c
>> > > +++ b/mm/slub.c
>> > > @@ -1423,6 +1423,11 @@ static int check_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab)
>> > >  			slab->inuse, slab->objects);
>> > >  		return 0;
>> > >  	}
>> > > +	if (slab->frozen) {
>> > > +		slab_err(s, slab, "Corrupted slab");
>> > 
>> > 
>> > "Slab folio disabled due to metadata corruption" ?
>> > 
>> > 
>> 
>> Yes, that's what I meant. 
>> Perhaps I should change the description from "Corrupted slab" to
>> "Metadata corrupt"?
>> 
> 
> I think the point here is that slab page corruption is different from slab 
> metadata corruption :)
> 
> The suggested phrasing, "Slab folio disabled due to metadata corruption", 
> sounds good to me.

What about:

"Slab disabled due to previous consistency check failure" ?

> 
>> > > @@ -2744,7 +2750,10 @@ static void *alloc_single_from_partial(struct kmem_cache *s,
>> > >  	slab->inuse++;
>> > >
>> > >  	if (!alloc_debug_processing(s, slab, object, orig_size)) {
>> > > -		remove_partial(n, slab);
>> > > +		if (folio_test_slab(slab_folio(slab))) {

Your patch adds add_full() here as in the previous versions. I wouldn't do
it anymore. Thanks to the frozen bit check in check_slab(), no further list
manipulation should happen that would trigger the list poison being detected.

Adding to full list would rather mean each sysfs-triggered validation will
reach the slab and output the new slab_err() message, which is not useful.
We want the corrupted slab to stay away from everything else, and only be
informed of further object freeing attempts.

>> > 
>> > 
>> > Does folio_test_slab test for the frozen bit??
>> > 
>> 
>> For slab folios, slab->fronzen has been set to 1.
>> For non-slab folios, we should not call remove_partial().
>> I'm not sure if I understand this correctly.
>> 
>> Thanks
>>