From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933256AbcKWIPj (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Nov 2016 03:15:39 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43028 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932839AbcKWIPh (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Nov 2016 03:15:37 -0500 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] drm: update MAINTAINERS for qemu drivers (bochs, cirrus, qxl, virtio-gpu) To: Gerd Hoffmann , Eric Blake References: <1479808693-30234-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <99e2e550-dad4-335f-e2d7-8a286863f57c@redhat.com> <8871cadb-3edf-5a3f-2da5-8981c12b79a0@redhat.com> <1479888396.16465.5.camel@redhat.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini , David Airlie , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, open list From: Thomas Huth Message-ID: <772c480f-86c5-3162-256c-45ee9c0cc9ea@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:13:49 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1479888396.16465.5.camel@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Wed, 23 Nov 2016 08:13:53 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 23.11.2016 09:06, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Hi, > >>>>>>>> +L: qemu-devel@nongnu.org >>>>>> >>>>>> qemu-devel list already has very high traffic - not sure whether it >>>>>> makes much sense to route even more additional patches here. Maybe >>>>>> rather create a separate mailing list like qemu-graphics@nongnu.org ? > >> So you've just managed to convince me that including qemu-devel on every >> driver patch, when qemu.git will not be modified, may indeed be >> overkill; when compared to the option of just creating a new dedicated >> list for the subset of kernel patches related to qemu drivers. > > Well, that isn't my intention. I want the kernel patches for qemu > graphics being more visible for developers working on the host (device > emulation) side. A separate list just for those patches is quite the > contrary ... > > Maybe virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org would be a better choice > than qemu-devel ... Yes, I agree, that sounds like a better fit. You might even get the attention from other people there who are working on virtualization solutions other than QEMU. Thomas