From: Yan Zhai <yan@cloudflare.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Aya Levin <ayal@nvidia.com>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@cloudflare.com,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
Alexander H Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 net-next 3/3] ipv6: avoid atomic fragment on GSO packets
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 22:32:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <77423bb774612f0e8eaabfd9501d03389ff2cdbd.1697779681.git.yan@cloudflare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1697779681.git.yan@cloudflare.com>
When the ipv6 stack output a GSO packet, if its gso_size is larger than
dst MTU, then all segments would be fragmented. However, it is possible
for a GSO packet to have a trailing segment with smaller actual size
than both gso_size as well as the MTU, which leads to an "atomic
fragment". Atomic fragments are considered harmful in RFC-8021. An
Existing report from APNIC also shows that atomic fragments are more
likely to be dropped even it is equivalent to a no-op [1].
Add an extra check in the GSO slow output path. For each segment from
the original over-sized packet, if it fits with the path MTU, then avoid
generating an atomic fragment.
Link: https://www.potaroo.net/presentations/2022-03-01-ipv6-frag.pdf [1]
Fixes: b210de4f8c97 ("net: ipv6: Validate GSO SKB before finish IPv6 processing")
Reported-by: David Wragg <dwragg@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan Zhai <yan@cloudflare.com>
---
net/ipv6/ip6_output.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
index 3270d56b5c37..3d4e8edaa10b 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
@@ -162,7 +162,13 @@ ip6_finish_output_gso_slowpath_drop(struct net *net, struct sock *sk,
int err;
skb_mark_not_on_list(segs);
- err = ip6_fragment(net, sk, segs, ip6_finish_output2);
+ /* Last GSO segment can be smaller than gso_size (and MTU).
+ * Adding a fragment header would produce an "atomic fragment",
+ * which is considered harmful (RFC-8021). Avoid that.
+ */
+ err = segs->len > mtu ?
+ ip6_fragment(net, sk, segs, ip6_finish_output2) :
+ ip6_finish_output2(net, sk, segs);
if (err && ret == 0)
ret = err;
}
--
2.30.2
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-20 5:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-20 5:32 [PATCH v3 net-next 0/3] ipv6: avoid atomic fragment on GSO output Yan Zhai
2023-10-20 5:32 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 1/3] ipv6: remove dst_allfrag test on ipv6 output Yan Zhai
2023-10-20 6:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2023-10-20 6:39 ` Yan Zhai
2023-10-20 9:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2023-10-20 10:00 ` Florian Westphal
2023-10-20 13:57 ` Yan Zhai
2023-10-20 5:32 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 2/3] ipv6: refactor ip6_finish_output for GSO handling Yan Zhai
2023-10-20 19:16 ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-10-20 5:32 ` Yan Zhai [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=77423bb774612f0e8eaabfd9501d03389ff2cdbd.1697779681.git.yan@cloudflare.com \
--to=yan@cloudflare.com \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=ayal@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome