mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
To: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
	<kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: <olteanv@gmail.com>, <ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	<andriin@fb.com>, <edumazet@google.com>, <weiwan@google.com>,
	<cong.wang@bytedance.com>, <ap420073@gmail.com>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linuxarm@openeuler.org>, <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
	<linux-can@vger.kernel.org>, <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
	<xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>, <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	<andrii@kernel.org>, <kafai@fb.com>, <songliubraving@fb.com>,
	<yhs@fb.com>, <john.fastabend@gmail.com>, <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	<bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <jonas.bonn@netrounds.com>,
	<pabeni@redhat.com>, <mzhivich@akamai.com>, <johunt@akamai.com>,
	<albcamus@gmail.com>, <kehuan.feng@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3] net: sched: implement TCQ_F_CAN_BYPASS for lockless qdisc
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 19:34:56 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <774fadf5-6383-f9e0-bbc6-e5862482a7d1@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5bef912e-aa7d-8a27-4d18-ac8cf4f7afdf@pengutronix.de>

On 2021/3/23 14:37, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 22.03.21 10:09, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>> Currently pfifo_fast has both TCQ_F_CAN_BYPASS and TCQ_F_NOLOCK
>> flag set, but queue discipline by-pass does not work for lockless
>> qdisc because skb is always enqueued to qdisc even when the qdisc
>> is empty, see __dev_xmit_skb().
>>
>> This patch calls sch_direct_xmit() to transmit the skb directly
>> to the driver for empty lockless qdisc too, which aviod enqueuing
>> and dequeuing operation. qdisc->empty is set to false whenever a
>> skb is enqueued, see pfifo_fast_enqueue(), and is set to true when
>> skb dequeuing return NULL, see pfifo_fast_dequeue().
>>
>> There is a data race between enqueue/dequeue and qdisc->empty
>> setting, qdisc->empty is only used as a hint, so we need to call
>> sch_may_need_requeuing() to see if the queue is really empty and if
>> there is requeued skb, which has higher priority than the current
>> skb.
>>
>> The performance for ip_forward test increases about 10% with this
>> patch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> Hi, Vladimir and Ahmad
>> 	Please give it a test to see if there is any out of order
>> packet for this patch, which has removed the priv->lock added in
>> RFC v2.
> 
> Overnight test (10h, 64 mil frames) didn't see any out-of-order frames
> between 2 FlexCANs on a dual core machine:
> 
> Tested-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
> 
> No performance measurements taken.

Thanks for the testing.
And I has done the performance measurement.

L3 forward testing improves from 1.09Mpps to 1.21Mpps, still about
10% improvement.

pktgen + dummy netdev:

 threads  without+this_patch   with+this_patch      delta
    1       2.56Mpps            3.11Mpps             +21%
    2       3.76Mpps            4.31Mpps             +14%
    4       5.51Mpps            5.53Mpps             +0.3%
    8       2.81Mpps            2.72Mpps             -3%
   16       2.24Mpps            2.22Mpps             -0.8%

> 
>>



      reply	other threads:[~2021-03-23 11:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-18  6:53 [PATCH net] net: sched: fix packet stuck problem " Yunsheng Lin
2021-03-19  9:25 ` [Linuxarm] " Yunsheng Lin
2021-03-19 19:45   ` Cong Wang
2021-03-22  1:37     ` Yunsheng Lin
2021-03-19 19:40 ` Cong Wang
2021-03-22  1:31   ` Yunsheng Lin
2021-03-22  9:09 ` [RFC v3] net: sched: implement TCQ_F_CAN_BYPASS " Yunsheng Lin
2021-03-22 20:00   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-03-23 11:39     ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-03-23  6:37   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-03-23 11:34     ` Yunsheng Lin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=774fadf5-6383-f9e0-bbc6-e5862482a7d1@huawei.com \
    --to=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
    --cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=albcamus@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=andriin@fb.com \
    --cc=ap420073@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cong.wang@bytedance.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=johunt@akamai.com \
    --cc=jonas.bonn@netrounds.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kehuan.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@openeuler.org \
    --cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=mzhivich@akamai.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=weiwan@google.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®