From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: rxrpc: Fix deadlock between call creation and sendmsg/recvmsg
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 16:13:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7782.1488471227@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <383d28fd-9a64-77ac-b8c0-f23408afc0ce@canonical.com>
Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote:
> I think the following part of the patch is problematic:
>
> call = rxrpc_find_call_by_user_ID(rx, user_call_ID);
> if (!call) {
> + ret = -EBADSLT;
> if (cmd != RXRPC_CMD_SEND_DATA)
> - return -EBADSLT;
> + goto error_release_sock;
> + ret = -EBUSY;
>
> At this point call is null, so the following code is performing a null
> pointer dereference on call when accessing call->state.
>
> Detected by CoverityScan CID#1414316 ("Dereference after null check")
>
> + if (call->state == RXRPC_CALL_UNINITIALISED ||
> + call->state == RXRPC_CALL_CLIENT_AWAIT_CONN ||
> + call->state == RXRPC_CALL_SERVER_PREALLOC ||
> + call->state == RXRPC_CALL_SERVER_SECURING ||
> + call->state == RXRPC_CALL_SERVER_ACCEPTING)
> + goto error_release_sock;
> call = rxrpc_new_client_call_for_sendmsg(rx, msg,
> user_call_ID,
Good catch, thanks, I put the state check in the wrong half of the
if-statement.
David
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-02 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-02 13:33 Colin Ian King
2017-03-02 16:13 ` David Howells [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7782.1488471227@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®