From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: intel_turbo_max_3: Remove restriction for HWP platforms
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 11:29:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7791d2f2-3a74-6dee-7055-feeaa6bbe2d8@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VdUnw0NjcNDKzFp-hZWho4A8RV=9Xthz-foZ6wTaT+Ftg@mail.gmail.com>
On 2/14/2018 11:29 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 9:50 PM, Srinivas Pandruvada
> <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> On systems supporting HWP (Hardware P-States) mode, we expected to
>> enumerate core priority via ACPI-CPPC tables. Unfortunately deployment of
>> TURBO 3.0 didn't use this method to show core priority. So users are not
>> able to utilize this feature in HWP mode.
>>
>> So remove the loading restriction of this driver for HWP enabled systems.
>> Even if there are some systems, which are providing the core priority via
>> ACPI CPPC, this shouldn't cause any conflict as the source of priority
>> definition is same.
>>
>
> Pushed to my review and testing queue, thanks!
>
> P.S. Should it go to stable?
older stable at least did not have the problem
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-14 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-12 19:50 Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-02-14 19:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-02-14 19:29 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2018-02-14 23:47 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7791d2f2-3a74-6dee-7055-feeaa6bbe2d8@linux.intel.com \
--to=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@infradead.org \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome