mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <Arun.Ramadoss@microchip.com>
To: <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc: <andrew@lunn.ch>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>, <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
	<linux@armlinux.org.uk>, <ceggers@arri.de>,
	<Tristram.Ha@microchip.com>, <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	<kuba@kernel.org>, <edumazet@google.com>, <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	<richardcochran@gmail.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<Woojung.Huh@microchip.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
	<b.hutchman@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch net-next 0/6] net: dsa: microchip: add gPTP support for LAN937x switch
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 06:44:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <77959874a88756045ae13e0efede5e697be44a7b.camel@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221017171916.oszpyxfnblezee6u@skbuf>

On Mon, 2022-10-17 at 20:19 +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
> know the content is safe
> 

Hi Vladimir,
Thanks for the comment.

> Hi Arun,
> 
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 08:58:51PM +0530, Arun Ramadoss wrote:
> > The LAN937x switch has capable for supporting IEEE 1588 PTP
> > protocol. This
> > patch series add gPTP profile support and tested using the ptp4l
> > application.
> > LAN937x has the same PTP register set similar to KSZ9563, hence the
> > implementation has been made common for the ksz switches. But the
> > testing is
> > done only for lan937x switch.
> 
> Would it be possible to actually test these patches on KSZ9563?
> 
> Christian Eggers tried to add PTP support for this switch a while
> ago,
> and he claims that two-step TX timestamping was de-featured for
> KSZ95xx
> due to hardware errata.
> 
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20201019172435.4416-8-ceggers@arri.de/

I had developed this patch set to add gPTP support for LAN937x based on
the Christian eggers patch for KSZ9563. Initially I thought of keeping
implementation specific to LAN937x through lan937x_ptp.c files. Since
the register sets are same for LAN937x/KSZ9563, I developed using
ksz_ptp.c so that in future Christain eggers patch can be merged to it
to support the 1 step clock support.
I read the Hardware errata of KSZ95xx on 2 step clock and found that it
was fixed in LAN937x switches. If this is case, Do I need to move this
2 step timestamping specific to LAN937x as LAN937x_ptp.c & not claim
for ksz9563 or common implementation in ksz_ptp.c & export the
functionality based on chip-id in get_ts_info dsa hooks.

--
Arun

> 
> > 
> > Arun Ramadoss (6):
> >   net: dsa: microchip: adding the posix clock support
> >   net: dsa: microchip: Initial hardware time stamping support
> >   net: dsa: microchip: Manipulating absolute time using ptp hw
> > clock
> >   net: dsa: microchip: enable the ptp interrupt for timestamping
> >   net: dsa: microchip: Adding the ptp packet reception logic
> >   net: dsa: microchip: add the transmission tstamp logic
> > 
> >  drivers/net/dsa/microchip/Kconfig       |  10 +
> >  drivers/net/dsa/microchip/Makefile      |   1 +
> >  drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c  |  43 +-
> >  drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.h  |  31 +
> >  drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_ptp.c     | 755
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_ptp.h     |  84 +++
> >  drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_ptp_reg.h |  68 +++
> >  include/linux/dsa/ksz_common.h          |  53 ++
> >  net/dsa/tag_ksz.c                       | 156 ++++-
> >  9 files changed, 1192 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_ptp.c
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_ptp.h
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_ptp_reg.h
> >  create mode 100644 include/linux/dsa/ksz_common.h
> > 
> > 
> > base-commit: 66ae04368efbe20eb8951c9a76158f99ce672f25
> > --
> > 2.36.1
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-18  6:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-14 15:28 Arun Ramadoss
2022-10-14 15:28 ` [RFC Patch net-next 1/6] net: dsa: microchip: adding the posix clock support Arun Ramadoss
2022-10-14 15:28 ` [RFC Patch net-next 2/6] net: dsa: microchip: Initial hardware time stamping support Arun Ramadoss
2022-10-14 15:28 ` [RFC Patch net-next 3/6] net: dsa: microchip: Manipulating absolute time using ptp hw clock Arun Ramadoss
2022-10-14 15:28 ` [RFC Patch net-next 4/6] net: dsa: microchip: enable the ptp interrupt for timestamping Arun Ramadoss
2022-10-14 15:28 ` [RFC Patch net-next 5/6] net: dsa: microchip: Adding the ptp packet reception logic Arun Ramadoss
2022-10-25  6:17   ` Christian Eggers
2022-10-26 20:13     ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-10-14 15:28 ` [RFC Patch net-next 6/6] net: dsa: microchip: add the transmission tstamp logic Arun Ramadoss
2022-10-17 17:19 ` [RFC Patch net-next 0/6] net: dsa: microchip: add gPTP support for LAN937x switch Vladimir Oltean
2022-10-18  6:44   ` Arun.Ramadoss [this message]
2022-10-18 10:29     ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-10-18 13:42       ` Arun.Ramadoss
2022-10-23 20:15         ` Christian Eggers
2022-10-25  3:41           ` Arun.Ramadoss
2022-10-26 20:07             ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-10-26 16:47         ` Christian Eggers
2022-10-26 21:44           ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-10-27 15:51             ` Arun.Ramadoss
2022-11-02 13:12               ` Christian Eggers
2022-11-02 13:11             ` Christian Eggers
2022-11-04 10:36               ` Arun.Ramadoss
2022-10-17 18:46 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-10-18  6:29   ` Arun.Ramadoss
2022-10-18  9:55     ` Vladimir Oltean

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=77959874a88756045ae13e0efede5e697be44a7b.camel@microchip.com \
    --to=arun.ramadoss@microchip.com \
    --cc=Tristram.Ha@microchip.com \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=Woojung.Huh@microchip.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=b.hutchman@gmail.com \
    --cc=ceggers@arri.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®