Re: [PATCH] timers: Exclude isolated cpus from timer migation

[Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>]

On 4/10/25 9:03 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Le Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 12:38:25PM +0200, Gabriele Monaco a écrit :
>> On Thu, 2025-04-10 at 10:26 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> How can that happen? There is always at least _ONE_ housekeeping,
>>> non-isolated, CPU online, no?
>>>
>> In my understanding it shouldn't, but I'm not sure there's anything
>> preventing the user from isolating everything via cpuset.
>> Anyway that's something no one in their mind should do, so I guess I'd
>> just opt for the cpumask_first (or actually cpumask_any, like before
>> the change).
> With "nohz_full=..." or "isolcpus=nohz,..." there is always at least one
> housekeeping CPU. But with isolcpus=[domain] or cpusets equivalents
> (v1 cpuset.sched_load_balance, v2 isolated partion) there is nothing that
> prevents all CPUs from being isolated.

Actually v2 won't allow users to isolate all the CPUs. Users can 
probably do that with v1's cpuset.sched_load_balance.

Cheers,
Longman