Re: [PATCH] watchdog: alim7101: Mark expected switch fall-through

["Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>]

Hi all,

Friendly ping:

Who can take this?

Thanks
--
Gustavo

On 3/20/19 7:15 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> 
> 
> On 3/20/19 7:12 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 3/20/19 11:16 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
>>> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>>>
>>> This patch fixes the following warning:
>>>
>>> drivers/watchdog/alim7101_wdt.c: In function ‘fop_ioctl’:
>>> drivers/watchdog/alim7101_wdt.c:279:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>>>     wdt_keepalive();
>>>     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> drivers/watchdog/alim7101_wdt.c:282:2: note: here
>>>    case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
>>>    ^~~~
>>>
>>> Notice that, in this particular case, the /* Fall through */
>>> comment is placed at the very bottom of the case statement,
>>> which is what GCC is expecting to find.
>>>
>>> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
>>>
>>> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling
>>> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>>
> 
> Thanks, Guenter. :)
> 
> --
> Gustavo
> 
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/watchdog/alim7101_wdt.c | 2 +-
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/alim7101_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/alim7101_wdt.c
>>> index 12f7ea62dddd..f5ada07e9202 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/alim7101_wdt.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/alim7101_wdt.c
>>> @@ -277,8 +277,8 @@ static long fop_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>>>               return -EINVAL;
>>>           timeout = new_timeout;
>>>           wdt_keepalive();
>>> -        /* Fall through */
>>>       }
>>> +        /* Fall through */
>>>       case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
>>>           return put_user(timeout, p);
>>>       default:
>>>
>>